Live data from Hacker News

Free and Open Source Alternative to Airdrop

sharedrop.io

101–110 of 156 posts

Re: Free and Open Source Alternative to Airdrop

#101
post #82
post #9

All of these "alternatives to airdop" don't seem to actually do what airdrop does, which is create an ad-hoc wireless connection. Airdrop isn't just a nice UI for sending files between people, it allows a wi-fi speed transfer between two devices that aren't connected to an existing network of that speed.

Mine does! https://github.com/spieglt/flyingcarpet

Haven't tried yet but this is really cool. Nice job.

Re: Free and Open Source Alternative to Airdrop

#102
post #82
post #9

All of these "alternatives to airdop" don't seem to actually do what airdrop does, which is create an ad-hoc wireless connection. Airdrop isn't just a nice UI for sending files between people, it allows a wi-fi speed transfer between two devices that aren't connected to an existing network of that speed.

Mine does! https://github.com/spieglt/flyingcarpet

Great project! Thank you for building it.

If the UI was simpler and more "Apple-like" (hate to say this) I could convince my non-tech coworkers/family/friends to use it.

Also, could you auto detect the other peer's OS? You could skip an extra step and UI element. Do you need it to know which WiFi bandwidth to use?

Re: Free and Open Source Alternative to Airdrop

#103
post #82
post #9

All of these "alternatives to airdop" don't seem to actually do what airdrop does, which is create an ad-hoc wireless connection. Airdrop isn't just a nice UI for sending files between people, it allows a wi-fi speed transfer between two devices that aren't connected to an existing network of that speed.

Mine does! https://github.com/spieglt/flyingcarpet

I used this a while ago, thanks!

Re: Free and Open Source Alternative to Airdrop

#104
My need is actually when I’m out somewhere fairly remote where there’s no WiFi Internet connection, but there’s either 4G or 5G data, the phones are running iOS and Android and are in close physical proximity with each other. Is there something that works for this device-to-device to send raw data with minimal friction and maximum security (don’t want the app to be sending the data elsewhere)?

Re: Free and Open Source Alternative to Airdrop

#105
post #13

Do you guys actually share this much locally? I have my local sync'd to my cloud storage and just pull it down if/when I need it. I'll just email/text people around me if they don't have airdrop compatibility.

Yes. I send pictures and videos (with original metadata/quality) to my friends and family, thus avoiding clutter in messaging apps.

Re: Free and Open Source Alternative to Airdrop

#106
post #104

My need is actually when I’m out somewhere fairly remote where there’s no WiFi Internet connection, but there’s either 4G or 5G data, the phones are running iOS and Android and are in close physical proximity with each other. Is there something that works for this device-to-device to send raw data with minimal friction and maximum security (don’t want the app to be sending the data elsewhere)?

Pretty slow, but you can still use Bluetooth transfers. Other ways are to have an WiFi hotspot on one of the devices and use one of these alternative apps.

Some apps out there are even capable of opening a small HTTP server, so you can technically serve files on tether.

Re: Free and Open Source Alternative to Airdrop

#107
post #77

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Which of the steps that I described required advanced technical knowledge? Edit: Ah maybe you thought setting up the server is an additional step. It is not. Share via HTTP is the server. It runs directly on your phone. The URL points directly to your device.

And the remote user's authentication is handled, how? And the routing, NAT, and discovery of your server's private IP address is handled?

None of that is necessary because you are not exposing anything to the internet. We are still talking about local sharing. Android does not have a firewall so there really is nothing to configure. But if you think it cannot be possible, try it for yourself.

Re: Free and Open Source Alternative to Airdrop

#108
post #73

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Person A takes group Photo. Person B "could I have that"? Two people touch phones and hit accept.

But neither of these implementations are going to provide this functionality, because of lack of development kits, right? So in the end people would just send it over some messaging app, which scales nicer, or create a shared album, which also scales nicer. Because smashing phones in group of 10 people might get tedious.

You don’t need to implement airdrop as separate functionality.

If you are capable of sharing a resource in a message or album, it is also automatically shareable via airdrop. iOS treats them all the same via the share sheet.

Re: Free and Open Source Alternative to Airdrop

#110
post #66
post #9

All of these "alternatives to airdop" don't seem to actually do what airdrop does, which is create an ad-hoc wireless connection. Airdrop isn't just a nice UI for sending files between people, it allows a wi-fi speed transfer between two devices that aren't connected to an existing network of that speed.

So Apple.com has built a connection that doesn't adhere to TCP/IP standards. Great engineering, people!

1. How do you know this? 2. Even if it's the case, why would it be wrong if it's the best choice for the requirements? (incredibly simple, fast, reliable local file sharing). TCP/IP isn't the end-all be-all.
Post reply on HN