Live data from Hacker News

The growing inequality of who gets to work from home

hbr.org

141–150 of 209 posts

Re: The growing inequality of who gets to work from home

#141
post #41
post #28

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> How many airplanes crashed due to The pilot being on drugs? As long as testing is uncommon you could say that number will remain at zero or near zero simply for lack of data. You comment implies but doesn’t state explicitly that you think truck drivers are more likely than pilots to be on drugs, is that true though?

Based on likely social setting difference due to salary difference plus the fact that truck drivers go through seedy places and do many long stretches alone, compared to pilots frequenting airports and hotels, and always working with a crew, I'm sure truck drivers use more drugs than airplane pilots. If you are not sure of this, I think your mind is "too open".

I think a better way to put it is that commercial aircraft personnel are under strict legal time limits while the legal time limits on truckers are not enforced particularly strongly and the trucking companies provide incentives not to follow those rules. So truck drivers are incented to take stimulants to a degree pilots are not.

“To a degree” means some pilots will still stay up late and try to use stimulants to stay awake. But the pressure on the two cohorts is not equivalent.

Re: The growing inequality of who gets to work from home

#142

Earlier quoted context omitted.

As an intentional non-parent who lived for a decade in several Asian countries: work calls are for doing work. Serious people don’t let their kids talk over their meetings.

Chill with the attitude, you have no idea what she’s been through with her kid. Maybe the kid just got off from a tantrum or something.

I find it equally probable she just doesn’t give a shit. People bend over backward to give people like this the benefit of the doubt for some reason.

/wfh parent of two

Re: The growing inequality of who gets to work from home

#143

The other day I phoned a service provider and the lady’s kid was babbling in the background and a children’s show was playing throughout the call. I couldn’t get off the phone fast enough. Either invest in voice isolation or don’t work from home. Functionally this lady brought her kid to my home office and blasted a cartoon during our meeting. Is this harsh of me and an unpopular opinion? Yes. I agree that Human bein…

You can always take your business elsewhere.

Re: The growing inequality of who gets to work from home

#145
post #90

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Honestly a lot of the “low skill jobs” actually have a high skill threshold but we just arbitrarily decide to suppress them. Take somewhere like Starbucks. They pay them minimum wage, churn em constantly so they’re never trained and make them work arbitrary shifts like 4 hour -> 2 hour unpaid break -> additional 4 hours. Those staff end up “low skilled” but in reality someone who was treated fairly and respected woul…

Those skilled baristas are welcome to open up their own shop to compete though (which probably many do , successfully). Problem is VCs don’t fund coffee shops, otherwise Starbucks would be “disrupted” overnight.

Was reading about Blank Street Coffee raising money recently to compete:

https://www.fastcompany.com/90867251/blank-street-coffee-rai...

Re: The growing inequality of who gets to work from home

#146
Life is built on inequality, but HBR wants to guilt us into all going back to the office out of some sense of equality? What a fucking joke. The only group this benefits are those at the very top. Either that or my commute is included in my working hours. I'll never go back to the office and wasting so much time commuting per week and not being compensated.

Re: The growing inequality of who gets to work from home

#147

Earlier quoted context omitted.

As an intentional non-parent who lived for a decade in several Asian countries: work calls are for doing work. Serious people don’t let their kids talk over their meetings.

Chill with the attitude, you have no idea what she’s been through with her kid. Maybe the kid just got off from a tantrum or something.

[deleted]

Re: The growing inequality of who gets to work from home

#148

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Chill with the attitude, you have no idea what she’s been through with her kid. Maybe the kid just got off from a tantrum or something.

I find it equally probable she just doesn’t give a shit. People bend over backward to give people like this the benefit of the doubt for some reason. /wfh parent of two

The thinking is if they have a kid then they’re the victims of heartless monsters (e.g. me) who expect them to work at the same level of professionalism as people who don’t have kids.

Re: The growing inequality of who gets to work from home

#149
post #44

Earlier quoted context omitted.

No its because usually low level jobs require you to operate heavy machinery like driving a truck or operating a forklift or work on the floor of the factory, or being around those things. Or for example handling cash at registers etc. I feel like this conspiracy is the author, and apparently hn needs to touch grass a little bit

A friend from Yugoslavia told me about his job there. Their lunch room looked like a grand cafe with every possible kind of liquor and a variety of beer on the tap. Around 11 am some of his coworkers had a few beers, in the sun, in front of the building. Around 1 they had some whiskey or vodka etc. At the end of the work day some went home, others stuck around. They had a few more drinks, some went home, others went…

When I was an engineer in the offshore drilling business in the early 80s, when we were in the office (not on a rig or in a shipyard), it was very common to call up a vendor to take us out for lunch and a couple beers. Usually that was it but there were days we took the afternoon off.

Alcohol at lunch in a business setting was much more widespread at the time.

Re: The growing inequality of who gets to work from home

#150

The other day I phoned a service provider and the lady’s kid was babbling in the background and a children’s show was playing throughout the call. I couldn’t get off the phone fast enough. Either invest in voice isolation or don’t work from home. Functionally this lady brought her kid to my home office and blasted a cartoon during our meeting. Is this harsh of me and an unpopular opinion? Yes. I agree that Human bein…

I think this is an overreaction. It was likely as simple as hanging up and calling again, if it bothered you so much. Or did you consider providing some polite feedback that the background noise was distracting you, I have had people buy headphones advertised as noise canceling and assume they work well but only realize they didn't until pointed out to them. Or did you even consider that she might work from an office…

What was an overreaction? I ignored it and got on with the task.

My reaction was to comment about it later under a post on Hacker News about WFH.

Post reply on HN