Live data from Hacker News

Shoelace: A library of web components

shoelace.style

111–114 of 114 posts

Re: Shoelace: A library of web components

#111

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Use a loading overlay that will show for 0.25 seconds if you're that concerned about this

User delays of 100-300 ms is perceptible to the user. This is the exact issue we want to avoid.

And in that delay they'll see a loading screen

Re: Shoelace: A library of web components

#112
post #62
post #51

We at Microsft used this to build apps.microsoft.com. We're quite happy with the results. Shoelace is customizable, accessible, extensible, easy to use.

You at Microsoft don't use Microsoft's fast.design?

We considered it, but Fast was missing some key components when we started building our web app.

Re: Shoelace: A library of web components

#113
post #104
post #62

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You at Microsoft don't use Microsoft's fast.design?

They at Microsoft don't use many of the stuff that we are supposed to use, e.g. see MAUI.

Also note, Shoelace was built by a Microsoft engineer, Cory LaViska. He left to work on Shoelace full-time[0] after it was acquired by FontAwesome.

[0]: https://blog.fontawesome.com/shoelace-joins-font-awesome/

Re: Shoelace: A library of web components

#114
post #47

I'm looking for a library of web components that: 1) Uses slots for composition 2) Does not use CSS-in-JS 3) Lightweight I understand that slots imply shadow Dom, and then shadow Dom usually means adding/adopting stylesheets into components, and that means css in js. But there's also ::part that allows piercing the shadow dom. Is there any library that uses it?

https://webcomponents.dev/blog/all-the-ways-to-make-a-web-co...

Yet, they are all Tools, and you don't learn a Technology by learning a Tool, or do you become a Writer when you learn Word?

``::part`` is part [sic] of the Standard, it doesn't require any tooling.

CCS in JS is your choice

https://jsfiddle.net/WebComponents/znbgf726/

https://i.imgur.com/inJAbQW.png

Post reply on HN