Earlier quoted context omitted.
These changes came about as part of the Trump administration & Republican efforts to reduce taxation. Because you can't trivially just cut taxes (as was done in 2017) without showing how you will either make up the missing revenue or reduce spending, they threw in a time-deferred measure - the new Section 174 that "demonstrated" how the tax cuts in 2017 would be paid for in the future. It was all sleight of hand, but…
What the recent Argentinian president had proposed for his country would be a good start for the US
While there are certainly people who believe as you do, you are not in a majority. There are also a lot of people in Argentina (possibly a majority) who don't agree with those policies either.