Live data from Hacker News

Spotube: Open-source Spotify-Youtube client

github.com

391–400 of 661 posts

Re: Spotube: Open-source Spotify-Youtube client

#391
post #113

Nifty. Please be aware that this is not a "spotify client" per se. It gets the data from Spotify, and plays the audio from YouTube. It's an interesting invention, and worthy of the first page, if you ask me.

Okay, THAT is Hacker News worthy.

anything related to free for paid content is HN worthy /s

Re: Spotube: Open-source Spotify-Youtube client

#392
post #220

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What does Spotify being crap have to do with a software engineer or musician being paid for their work? You think they shouldn't be paid because you don't like the company they work for?

Quite a lot actually. If the software engineers write an app that’s a bloated buggy mess that inconveniences people, some people will look for other ways to listen to the music they want to hear. For musicians, they have other avenues (arguably better anyhow) such as Bandcamp. I’ve bought tons of vinyl albums, tapes, and even just digital releases from there.

> some people will look for other ways to listen to the music they want to hear.

Those ways probably should involve some sort of compensation to the artists. Is that happening?

Re: Spotube: Open-source Spotify-Youtube client

#393
post #216

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Most of us who make 100k-300k made 70k at one point. I made 70k (5-8 years?) a lot longer than I've made 235k. I was absolutely not broke at 70k. In fact I thought that was the most money I'd ever make and that I was killing it for 25 or whatever I was.. lmao I made quite a bit more money than everyone my age I knew, most were still in college or in the 35-50k brackets.

>I was absolutely not broke at 70k. I'm genuinely glad that you weren't. Your experience is not everyone else's. I know people who have made around that salary who, for various reasons, were essentially broke. Much of the rest of your comment just sounds... braggadocious.

If you're broke at 70k you are simply bad with your finances. There are no excuses, unless you have a super rare medical condition. You can't blame anybody but yourself.

Re: Spotube: Open-source Spotify-Youtube client

#395
post #318

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I don't know a single engineer in the last decade that I've worked with or known that wants to live in SFBay. Hell, Google literally opened an office on 2nd and congress in Austin because people wanted to live in Austin and not SFbay. I was there on its opening day! $70k is completely fine in Houston, Dallas, Austin. I made around that in each one. Almost everyone I know here in Denver makes 70k-100k max and I'm in t…

>Everything isn't NYC or SFBay. Never said it was, I just pointed to two areas where $70k doesn't go very far. Simple as that. Edit: Your comment is very "I"-centric. Nobody cares about how many cars you have owned, because your life experience cannot be copy/pasted to everyone else. It's like you've missed the point.

Jesus. The point was that people are, and can be content on living in SF and NYC on under $100k. It's offensive that you think that every single person who makes 70k or whatever range is living in a box filled with rats or whatever you think it is.

Who do you think cooks, cleans, and serves drinks to people in SF/NYC? Sorry they aren't up to your standards living wise.

Re: Spotube: Open-source Spotify-Youtube client

#396
post #179

The lengths that literal engineers will go to to not have to pay $10/mo for music or $3 to rent a movie in 4k immediately. Can't believe I have adult friends who make 70-300k and they still pirate based on money, not quality/directors-cuts/anti-cheats, etc. I quit pirating when I got a real job and could afford to pay developers and movie teams for their effort. I write software. I want to get paid too, right? Why sh…

It's not about saving a few bucks, it's about taking responsibility for the consequences of your spending. If $1 out of $10 goes to supporting the artist and the other $9 goes towards stripping users of the ability to control their own devices, or towards other zero/negative sum games being played by the platform in the spirit of moat building, then paying for content through normal channels is doing more harm than g…

Under your same logic nobody should buy anything from your employer because they don’t pay you 100% of their profits. Probably only 2 or 3 dollars of every 10 they make goes to salary.

But we all know running a business has costs that aren’t salary.

Artists who sign to major labels get promotion and other assistance that costs money. That’s the trade off.

And they’re making less money than before because people pirated with Napster. Just look at music industry revenue charts. It only just recently exceeded pre-Napster levels and that is before adjusting for inflation. The average person is spending less money on music than they did in the 90s.

A new release CD was like $17 in 1995. So that’s $34 today. That would buy you one album. Today that buys you 3 months of listening to unlimited music.

So the price of Spotify is like when someone only buys 4 CDs every year.

https://www.nytimes.com/1995/07/05/arts/pennies-that-add-up-...

Re: Spotube: Open-source Spotify-Youtube client

#397

Nifty. Please be aware that this is not a "spotify client" per se. It gets the data from Spotify, and plays the audio from YouTube. It's an interesting invention, and worthy of the first page, if you ask me.

Watch Spotify revoke their public API key or reduce access to the public API because of this

Re: Spotube: Open-source Spotify-Youtube client

#398
post #179

The lengths that literal engineers will go to to not have to pay $10/mo for music or $3 to rent a movie in 4k immediately. Can't believe I have adult friends who make 70-300k and they still pirate based on money, not quality/directors-cuts/anti-cheats, etc. I quit pirating when I got a real job and could afford to pay developers and movie teams for their effort. I write software. I want to get paid too, right? Why sh…

I can afford streaming services but I pirate anyway. Why? Ads. I'm not paying to watch ads. Simple as.

Re: Spotube: Open-source Spotify-Youtube client

#399

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's not about saving a few bucks, it's about taking responsibility for the consequences of your spending. If $1 out of $10 goes to supporting the artist and the other $9 goes towards stripping users of the ability to control their own devices, or towards other zero/negative sum games being played by the platform in the spirit of moat building, then paying for content through normal channels is doing more harm than g…

People say this but don’t understand the reason artists don’t make much per-listener on Spotify etc. is because of their record deals, it’s nothing to do with Spotify. If you’re an independent artist you can live comfortably off of a small Spotify audience! The stories you hear about an artist getting pennies on millions of listens are because of their record deals and the credits on their work. You can’t solve this…

>If you’re an independent artist you can live comfortably off of a small Spotify audience!

Didn't Spotify recently stop paying any royalties for tracks with less than 1k streams?

Re: Spotube: Open-source Spotify-Youtube client

#400
post #126

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What is more hacker than bypassing rules and paid services? What was phreaking all about?

I think there's a difference between hacking for fun and feeling entitled to and arguing with weak arguments how you should be able to play music for free. This entire thread has absolutely nothing to do with e.g. telling how Spotify can be hacked and everything to do with script kiddies at best wanting to download a binary from GitHub to listen to music for free. But sure, maybe HN is that sad distribution mechanism…

This. Period.
Post reply on HN