Live data from Hacker News

LoaderShip – CSS-Only Loaders

loadership.com

61–65 of 65 posts

Re: LoaderShip – CSS-Only Loaders

#61
post #58

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Often in aspdotnet we have programmers Pretty sure this is a problem across many other development platforms. Odd that you singled out aspdotnet programmers.

> Odd that you singled out aspdotnet programmers. I was talking about myself but didn't want to admit I am the problem. (:

Ah, ok :)

Don't be so hard on yourself, even after 20+ years of .NET dev there are still things I can be a bit forgetful about, such as this UI annoyance.

Re: LoaderShip – CSS-Only Loaders

#62
post #56
post #50

Earlier quoted context omitted.

So much of this is because developers work on high-end systems with a ridiculously fast internet connection (whether at home or work). It isn't super-hard to fix this, but does take effort/time/money. For example, test on slow devices on slow connections. There are proxies that can throttle and introduce latency, or even let random connections timeout. There's a catch-22 here though: doing this early in a product's l…

There really is very little excuse for it, throttling is built right into the dev tools of both Chromium and Firefox, it's a couple of clicks away. It's as important as cross browser testing and easier to do. Another thing I've noticed a lot of sites are very poorly optimised for is latency. HTTP 1.1 is already poor in this regard due to the number of round trips required for setup, and when you start chaining these…

> It's as important as cross browser testing and easier to do.

Do people even do that nowadays?

Re: LoaderShip – CSS-Only Loaders

#63

Lately my internet connection has been ridiculously bad. It made me realise how often UX is ignored for bad connections. One of the things I notice with SPAs is that since the browser navigation does not occur normally, I get no indication from my browser that a link is loading, so the app is completely responsible of adding their own navigation indicators (which is uncommon to see in the wild). Also sort of unrelate…

There's the "Network Information API" but so far its a Chrom* only thing https://caniuse.com/netinfo and I can easily see how it might be a privacy concern given that it gives yet another data point to everyone

Re: LoaderShip – CSS-Only Loaders

#64

I made a few CSS-only single `div` loaders a while back, it was a fun challenge to make them interesting while only using a single div. https://codepen.io/snowbillr/pen/QEagmW

These are absolutely beautiful. I can't seem to find a license anywhere. Are they public domain?

Thank you! No license or anything, just go for it if you want to use them.

Re: LoaderShip – CSS-Only Loaders

#65

I did assume this was a webpack or otherwise package for loading css libraries. Took me a while to work out what it actually was. Probably because I’ve had such headaches with webpack within rails and would love something to make it disappear (yes I know there are newer solutions but each one breaks things in new and unique ways).

Yeah. I also had to get down past all of their points before I saw the images to understand what this is. And one of the points ironically said that it didn't waste my time. I've never heard the term "loader" being used here. Since a loader would be something that loads. These don't load anything, they just indicate that loading us happening. I typically call these "spinners" or sometimes "throbers" as that is what t…

Yes. Loading spinner. Loading indicator. Loading bar.

I associated 'css-loader' with a Webpack loader for css: https://webpack.js.org/loaders/#styling

Post reply on HN