LoaderShip – CSS-Only Loaders
loadership.com
LoaderShip – CSS-Only Loaders
1–10 of 65 posts
Re: LoaderShip – CSS-Only Loaders
#2https://www.loadership.com/loaders/dot_circular_scale
Thanks for sharing!
Re: LoaderShip – CSS-Only Loaders
#3So often, I look at a loader and think "How long will it take? Is it actually still doing something? Or should I try to reload the page?".
Also, I often wonder why developers put tools like this on an extra domain instead of just putting it on a page or subdomain on their personal domain. Is there a reason for this that I am missing?
Re: LoaderShip – CSS-Only Loaders
#4I wish loaders would provide some feedback on what is going on. So often, I look at a loader and think "How long will it take? Is it actually still doing something? Or should I try to reload the page?". Also, I often wonder why developers put tools like this on an extra domain instead of just putting it on a page or subdomain on their personal domain. Is there a reason for this that I am missing?
2. I think it makes it easier to get to your website without having to use search and it is easy to share like are we web yet dot org
Re: LoaderShip – CSS-Only Loaders
#5Re: LoaderShip – CSS-Only Loaders
#6Will give these a try for my next project
Re: LoaderShip – CSS-Only Loaders
#7Re: LoaderShip – CSS-Only Loaders
#8Looks great. Who’s behind this tho? Could not find anything on the authors.
Re: LoaderShip – CSS-Only Loaders
#9Re: LoaderShip – CSS-Only Loaders
#10I wish loaders would provide some feedback on what is going on. So often, I look at a loader and think "How long will it take? Is it actually still doing something? Or should I try to reload the page?". Also, I often wonder why developers put tools like this on an extra domain instead of just putting it on a page or subdomain on their personal domain. Is there a reason for this that I am missing?