[flagged]
They explicitly mention that it’s not.
Quinte neat. It simply using open source to preserve the existing financial players. Financial intermediaries are not eliminated.
11–20 of 146 posts
[flagged]
They explicitly mention that it’s not.
Quinte neat. It simply using open source to preserve the existing financial players. Financial intermediaries are not eliminated.
[flagged]
Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Taler does not require any Blockchain technology, and is also not based on proof-of-work or any other distributed consensus mechanism. Instead, Taler is based on blind signatures. However, it is theoretically possible to combine Taler with peer-to-peer crypto-currencies like Bitcoin. > It would be possible, however, to withdraw coins denominated in Bitcoin into a Taler wallet (with an appropriate exchange), which w…
[flagged]
Everytime you authenticate on your bank website you sign a payload, that doesn't make transactions there cryptocurrency.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Thanks. I was suspicious while reading. The language makes it feel like it's an official EU project, but there's no EU branding, links to anything in EU governing bodies. At best they seem to mention they applied for eu horizon funding, which anyone can do. Very much junk indeed.
Actually, NGI (Next Generation Internet) is an official EU project, and they are involved in this ( https://www.ngi.eu/ngi-projects/ngi-taler/ )
[flagged]
On the contrary, GNU Taler is only a transaction system, and uses advanced cryptography and infrastructure that allow it to be bearer-based, i.e., actually decentralized transactions between two offline parties can take place. It can actually do digital cash, with buyers privacy, and all.
That said, I'm not saying we need such a technology. Only that it's clearly not cryptobro bullshit.
1. it's not based on any kind of blockchain,
2. it's not a currency, it's a payment system which you could use to transfer other currencies (euro, dollar, ...) and
3. unlike most blockchain-based currencies it offers anonymity (only for buyers, not for sellers, though)
So a dead initiative?
My question is: How does the average Jane and Joe benefits compared to Debit and Credit Cards? Privacy, they do not care. Being anonymous, they do not care. So a dead initiative?
> This makes even micro-payments possible, creating an interesting and privacy preserving alternative to subscription- or advertisement-based revenue for newspapers and other publishers.