Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

Show HN: Privy - Open-source, privacy oriented alternative to GitHub Copilot

github.com

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

31–40 of 58 posts

Re: Show HN: Privy - Open-source, privacy oriented alternative to GitHub Copilot

#31

Post by ui90909090 »

rbut wrote: post #30
ui90909090 wrote: post #27

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I am genuinely curious to know, what is your expectation here? He gave you credit in Github. He called it forever "indebted", which IMO is too much. You put out code under MIT license. MIT license means anyone can take the copy and fork it. Why are you disappointed? Are you disappointed because a person of Indian origin did it better than you Or are you disappointed that because you wanted all fame but he took your c…

Considering both repositories are on Github, actually forking it instead of re-commiting it all as 'init commit' would be a good start. As you said, nothing compels srikanth235 to do this though, but it's a generally more respectable (acceptable?) way to continue someone elses work as a new project. Also not sure why you had to bring the race of srikanth235 into it.

[flagged]

Re: Show HN: Privy - Open-source, privacy oriented alternative to GitHub Copilot

#32

Post by [deleted] »

ui90909090 wrote: post #27
lgrammel wrote: post #20

So, you essentially took my project ( https://github.com/rubberduck-ai/rubberduck-vscode ), and instead of contributing to it or forking it, you recommitted all the code under your own name, with a few small tweaks. To be fair, I saw that you give credit, but it's kind of disappointing still given that prob 98% of the project is the work of the Rubberduck contributors. I know Rubberduck is not that active any more, b…

I am genuinely curious to know, what is your expectation here? He gave you credit in Github. He called it forever "indebted", which IMO is too much. You put out code under MIT license. MIT license means anyone can take the copy and fork it. Why are you disappointed? Are you disappointed because a person of Indian origin did it better than you Or are you disappointed that because you wanted all fame but he took your c…

[deleted]

Re: Show HN: Privy - Open-source, privacy oriented alternative to GitHub Copilot

#33

Post by [deleted] »

ui90909090 wrote: post #27
lgrammel wrote: post #20

So, you essentially took my project ( https://github.com/rubberduck-ai/rubberduck-vscode ), and instead of contributing to it or forking it, you recommitted all the code under your own name, with a few small tweaks. To be fair, I saw that you give credit, but it's kind of disappointing still given that prob 98% of the project is the work of the Rubberduck contributors. I know Rubberduck is not that active any more, b…

I am genuinely curious to know, what is your expectation here? He gave you credit in Github. He called it forever "indebted", which IMO is too much. You put out code under MIT license. MIT license means anyone can take the copy and fork it. Why are you disappointed? Are you disappointed because a person of Indian origin did it better than you Or are you disappointed that because you wanted all fame but he took your c…

[deleted]

Re: Show HN: Privy - Open-source, privacy oriented alternative to GitHub Copilot

#34

Post by [deleted] »

[deleted] wrote: post #33
ui90909090 wrote: post #27

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I am genuinely curious to know, what is your expectation here? He gave you credit in Github. He called it forever "indebted", which IMO is too much. You put out code under MIT license. MIT license means anyone can take the copy and fork it. Why are you disappointed? Are you disappointed because a person of Indian origin did it better than you Or are you disappointed that because you wanted all fame but he took your c…

[deleted]

[deleted]

Re: Show HN: Privy - Open-source, privacy oriented alternative to GitHub Copilot

#35

Post by ignoramous »

austhrow743 wrote: post #17
ignoramous wrote: post #2

Nice. > Some of the popular LLMs that we recommend are: Mistral, CodeLLama 1. Surprised Mistral ( Mixtral ?) is recommended for code generation / explanation alongside a fine-tuned CodeLlama ? 2. Recent human evals put Microsoft's WaveCoder-Ultra-6.7B (SoTA w/ GPT4) at the top of the rankings with WizardCoder-33B , Magiccoder-S-DS-6.7B trailing: https://twitter.com/TeamCodeLLM_AI/status/174755128687745064...

Are you able explain what the charts mean? Only one of the three has wavecoder at the top.

Those charts show pass@k metric (expectation at least k generated samples are correct out of n) on OpenAI and Octopack problem evals for code.

WaveCoder: https://arxiv.org/abs/2312.14187 (section 3.2)

Octopack: https://github.com/bigcode-project/octopack

Re: Show HN: Privy - Open-source, privacy oriented alternative to GitHub Copilot

#36

Post by lgrammel »

ui90909090 wrote: post #27
lgrammel wrote: post #20

So, you essentially took my project ( https://github.com/rubberduck-ai/rubberduck-vscode ), and instead of contributing to it or forking it, you recommitted all the code under your own name, with a few small tweaks. To be fair, I saw that you give credit, but it's kind of disappointing still given that prob 98% of the project is the work of the Rubberduck contributors. I know Rubberduck is not that active any more, b…

I am genuinely curious to know, what is your expectation here? He gave you credit in Github. He called it forever "indebted", which IMO is too much. You put out code under MIT license. MIT license means anyone can take the copy and fork it. Why are you disappointed? Are you disappointed because a person of Indian origin did it better than you Or are you disappointed that because you wanted all fame but he took your c…

My expectation would have been a fork, or a repo thats started with the full commit history.

Re: Show HN: Privy - Open-source, privacy oriented alternative to GitHub Copilot

#40

Post by srikanth235 »

ignoramous wrote: post #35
austhrow743 wrote: post #17

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Are you able explain what the charts mean? Only one of the three has wavecoder at the top.

Those charts show pass@k metric (expectation at least k generated samples are correct out of n) on OpenAI and Octopack problem evals for code. WaveCoder: https://arxiv.org/abs/2312.14187 (section 3.2) Octopack: https://github.com/bigcode-project/octopack

While testing internally, Mistral worked well. But these models are just starting points. Will add support for the models WaveCoder-Ultra-6.7B, WizardCoder-33B, Magiccoder-S-DS-6.7B, etc soon.
Post reply on HN