What bothers me about a lot of self-checkout machines are the annoying attempts to "up-sell" me on stuff; in quotes because these hoops that you need to jump through before paying are not always trying to literally sell you something. No, I don't want to scan a loyalty points card. No, I don't want to donate to your charity. No, I don't want an email receipt just print it please. And I don't care about whatever announcement you want to shove in my face before I can pay. Just let me pay and be on my way already FFS.
The failure of self-checkout technology
381–390 of 621 posts
Re: The failure of self-checkout technology
#382It feels like almost all the issues with self-checkout technology come from the attempts to minimise shoplifting, which don't even seem that effective at doing that. In theory, a system that let you scan products the same way checkout staff do without any weight checks or bagging area rules or other interruptions would be incredibly efficient. Especially if you could do things like scan the same product multiple time…
What's the point of "self" checkout if somebody is required—not by failure of the system but by rules—to come help me several times during the process?
Edit: at least with alcohol I know it’s coming. But it feels like every time I try to use self-checkout I’m foiled by surprise rules about particular items.
Re: The failure of self-checkout technology
#383I really like those that you can find in Switzerland (either in Coop or Migros). The basic assumption is "trust the customer". Thus, the self-checkout devices don't have the annoying "you must weight the article you just scanned". You just scan them one by one, add them to your bag, pay at the end, and that's it. Sometimes (it happens to me around 1/year) you get a random search, which is not that bad as they just ra…
Waitrose in the UK is like that. They seem to place trust in the customer which feels nice. I don't know if they have some clever ways of monitoring customers, but it feels good not to be treated with suspicion. I've never had anyone check my bags. Sainsburys annoys me every time. The slightest delay in putting the scanned item on the scale and it starts nagging you, very loudly. I avoid them as far as possible. M&S…
However, they are much less annoying here. I assume it's all just parameters that are tuned to local requirements.
(Have you swiped your Nectar card?)
Re: The failure of self-checkout technology
#384>employees who get taken away from their other duties to help customers deal with the confusing and error prone kiosks. I have seen these customers. I do not understand. What are they doing at the self-checkout that is confusing? I have used dozens of different implementations and they are all simplicity incarnate. So I just lump them all in with the folks who don't know that cars need oil changes, take more than 45…
This is obviously something that should be fixed in the system, but it's nothing that the consumer can do anything about.
Re: The failure of self-checkout technology
#385In Hongkong, most major supermarkets have self-checkout sections now. Usually, there is a single person standing by to fix any issues. I am sure the labour cost for checkout is much lower in those areas.
In Tokyo, Japan, most convenience stores have at least one self-checkout register. (Can anyone comment about combini other regions of the country? And, Aeon: Do they have self-checkout yet?) The interface in each chain takes some getting used to (so many steps!), but then you get the hang of it. Unsurprisingly, many natives continue to queue for service, even if it takes longer than self-checkout.
Can anyone comment on the situation in Singapore, another highly developed, but very low crime location?
Re: The failure of self-checkout technology
#386Re: The failure of self-checkout technology
#387I have no bad experiences with self-checkout. None.
Going to a staffed-only checkout feels like going back 20 years in time. They take up more space, they can move slower, suddenly customers will kill the speed because they need to look for their coupons, pay with change, or whatever.
Re: The failure of self-checkout technology
#388It feels like almost all the issues with self-checkout technology come from the attempts to minimise shoplifting, which don't even seem that effective at doing that. In theory, a system that let you scan products the same way checkout staff do without any weight checks or bagging area rules or other interruptions would be incredibly efficient. Especially if you could do things like scan the same product multiple time…
And security: You only need a single person standing there to scary away 95% of shoplifters.
I watched a YouTube video from the channel "Not Just Bikes" about grocery shopping in Amsterdam, Netherlands showed a supermarket where you carry the "pricing gun/lazer" with you and "beep" each item as it enters your basket. I have no idea how they reduce shoplifting. Can anyone comment?
Re: The failure of self-checkout technology
#389Earlier quoted context omitted.
Maybe, though I doubt it. Cash has some advantages which make it very appealing in certain circumstances. Anonymity is only one of them, and probably not even the most important one – cash does not rely on network being available.
Where do you live where there isn't 24/7 internet saturation from at least three different sources? When the internet goes out, the stores just close.
Re: The failure of self-checkout technology
#390Earlier quoted context omitted.
Or just type the name of the vegetable or just copy the 4-digit code on the sticker attached to the vegetable. At least in the US there is no problem with buying vegetables in self-checkout.
Vegetables don't have stickers. They are vegetables. Ah the name… but is it a golden extra apple or a yellow apple? Or perhaps a extra fresh guaranteed apple?