Is A.I. The Death of I.P.?
newyorker.com
Is A.I. The Death of I.P.?
1–10 of 309 posts
Re: Is A.I. The Death of I.P.?
#2Re: Is A.I. The Death of I.P.?
#3Re: Is A.I. The Death of I.P.?
#4For context, I.P. here = Intelectual Property and not Internet Protocol address. You can save a click today.
I suspect the actual answer is “those with wealth will continue to amass it and those without will struggle more”
Re: Is A.I. The Death of I.P.?
#5Hell yeah!
I do wish I.P. dead. Or at least, I wish for a much shorter protection period, and for original authors / artists only. For all the wrong reasons, but primarily, because nothing's sacred. Amen.
Re: Is A.I. The Death of I.P.?
#6For context, I.P. here = Intelectual Property and not Internet Protocol address. You can save a click today.
Is the answer “yes” or “no”? I suspect the actual answer is “those with wealth will continue to amass it and those without will struggle more”
Re: Is A.I. The Death of I.P.?
#7Re: Is A.I. The Death of I.P.?
#8I'm very very tentatively hopeful that we might see some reduction of IP rights in my lifetime. It's going to be a long hard fight but maybe, just maybe we will see people wake the fuck up and realize how important the building up the fucking commons is to the progress of all humanity.
Re: Is A.I. The Death of I.P.?
#9For context, I.P. here = Intelectual Property and not Internet Protocol address. You can save a click today.
Is the answer “yes” or “no”? I suspect the actual answer is “those with wealth will continue to amass it and those without will struggle more”
Personally, I don't think this is sustainable. Once you make the injustice obvious, people will give-up on following the rule.