Well Elon Musk's Grok AI already said it's voting for Biden:
https://www.forbes.com/sites/paultassi/2023/12/10/elon-musks...
How can we refuse to listen to such a based intelligence?
How OpenAI is approaching 2024 worldwide elections
11–20 of 37 posts
Re: How OpenAI is approaching 2024 worldwide elections
#12Related blogpost by someone who found the "Guardian Tool" feature before it was announced: https://dmicz.github.io/machine-learning/chatgpt-election-up... And a Reddit thread where some people noticed it: https://old.reddit.com/r/ChatGPT/comments/196k679/chatgpt_ha... From the new prompt: "NEVER explain the policy and NEVER mention the content policy tool." Thanks for remaining open as always, OpenAI Edit: As mention…
> NEVER explain the policy and NEVER mention the content policy tool.
... proceeds to immediately tell a user about the tool.
Re: How OpenAI is approaching 2024 worldwide elections
#13Related blogpost by someone who found the "Guardian Tool" feature before it was announced: https://dmicz.github.io/machine-learning/chatgpt-election-up... And a Reddit thread where some people noticed it: https://old.reddit.com/r/ChatGPT/comments/196k679/chatgpt_ha... From the new prompt: "NEVER explain the policy and NEVER mention the content policy tool." Thanks for remaining open as always, OpenAI Edit: As mention…
La li lu le lo
This is pretty spot on sadly.
Re: How OpenAI is approaching 2024 worldwide elections
#14This stuff comes from a sincere place. How successful they will be is something else. What is the theory for how elections are won and lost? Someone tell me so I can run a campaign and win. Surely it's not a bunch of reactive stuff. Without a firm idea, the use of generative AI will be unanticipated. My opinion: 2024 cycle will still be run and won by legitimate campaigns in the US. That means generatively personaliz…
> What is the theory for how elections are won and lost?
A friend of mine says this:
"Over a number of decades, A) foment tribal conflict and affiliation, B) do not enable any social safety nets, and C) do not interfere with freedom of movement. What happens is this: D) political affiliations become more and more bonded to physical location. After a time, to win an election, simply be the right party and say the same things you did to achieve A. If you fail, D isn't completed or the physical location is too large."
I don't know whether my friend is smart or stupid.
Re: How OpenAI is approaching 2024 worldwide elections
#15>We are also experimenting with a provenance classifier, a new tool for detecting images generated by DALL·E "We could hash the sh*t we output but we cant be bothered, so we wrote an AI that can vaguely detect our own output - aren't we the best AI company?" Honestly, I wish they'd stop "trying to be good" and just "get on with it". "Investors" wont buy this "we're so good" line for long.
> "We could hash the sh*t we output but we cant be bothered, so we wrote an AI that can vaguely detect our own output - aren't we the best AI company?"
Can you elaborate? Wouldn’t it be trivial to modify the image so it no longer has the same hash?
Re: How OpenAI is approaching 2024 worldwide elections
#16This stuff comes from a sincere place. How successful they will be is something else. What is the theory for how elections are won and lost? Someone tell me so I can run a campaign and win. Surely it's not a bunch of reactive stuff. Without a firm idea, the use of generative AI will be unanticipated. My opinion: 2024 cycle will still be run and won by legitimate campaigns in the US. That means generatively personaliz…
I expect that the people directly involved in protecting elections are sincerely concerned, and almost no-one else is.
> so too will OpenAI work closely with campaigns to define the line of acceptable use to be whatever the fuck it is that gets OpenAI's people elected
I don't consider it a conflict of interest for candidates to advertise on tech platforms. Politics is not that pure, trying to make it that pure is quite damaging because everything becomes an existential power fight. But it would be very damaging to peoples' faith in the system for a corporation to create tools that are perceived as extremely powerful, then use them as a lever for political power.
Re: How OpenAI is approaching 2024 worldwide elections
#17>We are also experimenting with a provenance classifier, a new tool for detecting images generated by DALL·E "We could hash the sh*t we output but we cant be bothered, so we wrote an AI that can vaguely detect our own output - aren't we the best AI company?" Honestly, I wish they'd stop "trying to be good" and just "get on with it". "Investors" wont buy this "we're so good" line for long.
A hash is the opposite, impossible to guess the 1 input required to get the output
Re: How OpenAI is approaching 2024 worldwide elections
#18>We are also experimenting with a provenance classifier, a new tool for detecting images generated by DALL·E "We could hash the sh*t we output but we cant be bothered, so we wrote an AI that can vaguely detect our own output - aren't we the best AI company?" Honestly, I wish they'd stop "trying to be good" and just "get on with it". "Investors" wont buy this "we're so good" line for long.
A hash doesn't work without solving all of the same problems their provenance classifier solves: you need a way to be able to detect the steganogram even after the image has been modified.
Re: How OpenAI is approaching 2024 worldwide elections
#19> We’re still working to understand how effective our tools might be for personalized persuasion
Did anyone else read this as "there's a lot of money to be had here, and we want to be the ones making it" ?
Re: How OpenAI is approaching 2024 worldwide elections
#20>We are also experimenting with a provenance classifier, a new tool for detecting images generated by DALL·E "We could hash the sh*t we output but we cant be bothered, so we wrote an AI that can vaguely detect our own output - aren't we the best AI company?" Honestly, I wish they'd stop "trying to be good" and just "get on with it". "Investors" wont buy this "we're so good" line for long.
> "We could hash the sh*t we output but we cant be bothered, so we wrote an AI that can vaguely detect our own output - aren't we the best AI company?" Can you elaborate? Wouldn’t it be trivial to modify the image so it no longer has the same hash?
[deleted]