Live data from Hacker News

Disney backs down from 'Steamboat Willie' YouTube copyright claim

mashable.com

111–115 of 115 posts

Re: Disney backs down from 'Steamboat Willie' YouTube copyright claim

#111

Earlier quoted context omitted.

In ‘orphan work’ situations as long as a person had made a good faith effort to locate the copyright owner, and therefore isn’t infringing someone’s copyright wilfully; criminal liability won’t apply. The worst you’ll realistically face is an after the fact civil suit

Lol who on earth is talking about criminal prosecution of copyright? Copyright is a strict liability civil offense.

think there’s a misunderstanding. in my jurisdiction we use the word offence to refer to criminal actions. If the penalty is only civil, then this bolsters the case for being bold toward omens treatment of orphan works

Re: Disney backs down from 'Steamboat Willie' YouTube copyright claim

#112

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Lol who on earth is talking about criminal prosecution of copyright? Copyright is a strict liability civil offense.

think there’s a misunderstanding. in my jurisdiction we use the word offence to refer to criminal actions. If the penalty is only civil, then this bolsters the case for being bold toward omens treatment of orphan works

But we are talking about US copyright law - that's what the article is about, and there's no real issue with criminal enforcement of copyright. What jurisdiction are you in? It doesn't bolster anything because in the US copyright infringement is strict liability and civil enforcement of copyright actions are frequent. The greater point anyway was that it's odd for you to offer this legal advice while simultaneously not being aware that copyright infringement is strict liability. Now you are also saying you didn't think about the civil context at all. Bizarre.

Re: Disney backs down from 'Steamboat Willie' YouTube copyright claim

#113
post #18
post #14

Everytime I see complications with copyright I think that it should be similar to patents. Short length of time with an optional renewal if the work is valuable enough. I don't think it would be too much to ask for rights holders to be required to apply for copyright (for a small fee, let's say $5/work) and provide a central authority with a copy of their work. This would solve issues such as 1) when copyright ends f…

> rights holders to be required to apply for copyright (for a small fee, let's say $5/work) This would drastically change our current copyright regime. As it stands, everything you write has automatic copyright, and doesn't require even the smallest, brokest artist to do anything—or pay anything—in order to ensure that their creations cannot profit others without their consent. Requiring every work to be registered i…

It wouldn't change anything, in order to enforce your copyright in the US, you need to pay for a registration, which also isn't very expensive.

Re: Disney backs down from 'Steamboat Willie' YouTube copyright claim

#114

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>I’d expect that if the maker undertook a thorough and well-documented search for the rights holder; then just made it anyway, they’d legally be covered In a sane, rational world that would probably be the case. Too bad we don't live on one!

We need orphan work legislation to clarify the law in this area

We really do.

Re: Disney backs down from 'Steamboat Willie' YouTube copyright claim

#115
In the whirlwind of the freelancing landscape, where time is money and downtime is a luxury no freelancer can afford, ADRIAN LAMO HACKER emerged as a digital superhero at the recommendation of a seasoned colleague. Picture a scenario where I, as a freelancer, teetered on the brink of potential data loss – an imminent threat that could disrupt not just my workflow but the very foundation of my freelance business. It was a fellow freelancer, a trusted colleague who had navigated the challenges of the freelancing world before me, who first recommended ADRIAN LAMO HACKER. Little did I know that this recommendation would soon become the lifeline of my digital endeavors. As I faced the looming specter of losing critical project files, client communications, and the intricacies of ongoing collaborations, the sheer magnitude of what I almost lost struck me with a paralyzing force. In the ever-evolving landscape of freelance work, where client deadlines are sacred and projects demand unwavering commitment, the potential data loss was not just a technical glitch. It was a threat to my professional reputation, a risk to the relationships cultivated over the years, and a disruption to the seamless workflow I had meticulously built. The realization of the extensive loss I was on the verge of experiencing sent ripples of panic through my freelance routine. Speak with ADRIAN LAMO HACKER via email: Adrianlamo@consultant.com – a recommendation that transformed into a digital lifeline. As the recovery tool seamlessly swooped in, it wasn't merely rescuing data; it was salvaging the countless hours invested in crafting proposals, delivering projects, and nurturing client relationships. The peace of mind it provided was beyond measure – it was the assurance that my freelancing career, often hanging by the thread of timely deliveries and client satisfaction, remained untarnished. The relief that washed over me was profound. It wasn't just about avoiding downtime; it was about preserving the integrity of my freelance business. ADRIAN LAMO HACKER became synonymous with uninterrupted workflow and undisturbed focus on what matters most – delivering quality work to clients. In the aftermath of this potential catastrophe, I not only recovered my data but also fortified my freelance venture with a tool that goes beyond recovery – it ensures the peace of mind every freelancer craves in the face of digital uncertainties. Consult ADRIAN LAMO HACKER via Email: Adrianlamo@consultant.com
Post reply on HN