Live data from Hacker News

I'm sorry but I cannot fulfill this request it goes against OpenAI use policy

amazon.com

531–540 of 768 posts

Re: I'm sorry but I cannot fulfill this request it goes against OpenAI use policy

#531

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Hundreds of millions are spent on translators every year. It's a major expense in the EU budget, for example. A lot of people are going to jail for fraud if people aren't actually doing the work.

Oh, didn't know about that! Learning something new everyday i guess. Automatic translation works very well for technical documents, but it doesn't work that well for novels. So i thought, most of the translation jobs would be gone already. I think, given a little bit of time, a handful of years, translation will be automated 95% or more, across the board, for every kind of document.

I know people in the translation business. Automatic translation is out of the question in a lot of businesses and areas. One category would be safety-critical businesses where companies can get into a world of legal hurt if their translations aren't exact (medical, legal, defense, etc.) Saving a few bucks on automatic translations loses its appeal if you really need the text to be correct. The translators will also be liable for wrong translations, also a very important factor for professional clients.

Another example would be highly specialised, industry-specific texts with a lot of jargon, for which professional translation offices get you translators who aren't just fluent in the languages, but also knowledgeable about the area the text is about.

Re: I'm sorry but I cannot fulfill this request it goes against OpenAI use policy

#532

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I brought up translation as a risk with a friend. If you pay someone for a translation these days, there is a chance they will just feed it to some AI to cut costs. You'll have no way to validate yourself if you don't speak the language.

Do you usually just pick a person at random when hiring or do you spend some effort looking into their qualifications and references? How's your hypothetical any different now than it would've been in the past 15 or so years of Google Translate's existence?

Sure, but people get burned despite attempting to be careful all the time.

Translation software predates Google translate, and I'm not claiming something has suddenly changed. It's slowly gotten better, and I assume the temptation to only pretend to have human translation will keep growing with it. The safer a scam seems, the more people will try it.

Re: I'm sorry but I cannot fulfill this request it goes against OpenAI use policy

#533

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The difference is, a junior employee knows that killing prod is bad. An LLM doesn't know anything.

And we only do it once (I didn't kill the db, but I did kick off a process thinking I was in a test environment).

Were you the guy sending test push notifications from Firebase to all users of Xperia phones last year? :D

Re: I'm sorry but I cannot fulfill this request it goes against OpenAI use policy

#534

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Maybe FuPS? So it's easier to tell from other two FPS-es.

Fups FTW!

That’s it. FUPS is a frequency measurement of the rate at which an AI produces “fuckups” per second, where a “fuckup” is defined as an individual non-unique production error that has a measurable negative impact on society.

Re: I'm sorry but I cannot fulfill this request it goes against OpenAI use policy

#536
post #157

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>> unattended LLM do anything for your company at all. It can, and will, fuck up dramatically sooner or later. So, just like any other random employee?

To err is human. To fuck up a million times per second, you need a computer. Granted, here at the beginning of 2024, an LLM can not quite attain that fuck up velocity. But take heart! Many of the smartest people on Earth are working on solving that exact problem even as you read this.

I mean is this not part of the AI safety thing some people warn about... not that AI will attain human fuck up velocity, but far exceed it?

Re: I'm sorry but I cannot fulfill this request it goes against OpenAI use policy

#537

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Just a chance? I routinely translate hundred pages of pdfs to greek, in 3 minutes. The translation is far from perfect depending the text and it still needs a human in the loop for corrections, but i couldn't imagine translating a 300 pages pdf to greek by hand. There is also the translaxy bot on poe.com which i use to translate english or modern greek to ancient greek. Out of this world good translation. I mean, are…

Have you seen any good translation tool from video to text yet? I'm trying to find something for Estonian to English and having little luck

Whisper does audio to text with translation, so you'd have to extract the audio channel first.

Re: I'm sorry but I cannot fulfill this request it goes against OpenAI use policy

#538

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Why is it that LLMs are so often compared to employees and their responsibilities? In my opinion, it is an employee that actively USES the LLM as a tool and this employee (or his/her employer) is responsible for the results.

100% why is that perspective so rare?

Because humans defer responsibility to Moloch

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Computers_Don%27t_Argue

Re: I'm sorry but I cannot fulfill this request it goes against OpenAI use policy

#539
post #393

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That link already leads to a "not found" page. I hope it was because they are banning those catch fish, and not an isolated case due you put the link.

The mole was whacked, but only slightly. The seller's account and remaining scammy inventory is still up. The offense here was clearly the embarassment to Amazon from a couple of examples of blatant incompetence, not the scam itself. https://www.amazon.com/s?k=FOPEAS

At some point today an Amazon employee read this thread as silently voiced "god damnit, I'll have to do something about this"

Re: I'm sorry but I cannot fulfill this request it goes against OpenAI use policy

#540

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Why is it that LLMs are so often compared to employees and their responsibilities? In my opinion, it is an employee that actively USES the LLM as a tool and this employee (or his/her employer) is responsible for the results.

It's a dumb/lazy/specious talking point. You can kill someone with a pencil just like you can kill someone with a gun, but the gun scales up the danger so we treat it and regulate it differently. You can kill someone with a bike, a car, or an airplane, but the risks go up at each step so we treat and regulate the respective drivers differently. If AI gives every individual the power to suddenly scale up the bullshit…

One of the biggest recent "mass shootings" was some guy at a walmart with a $200 bow and arrow kit.
Post reply on HN