Live data from Hacker News

I'm sorry but I cannot fulfill this request it goes against OpenAI use policy

amazon.com

331–340 of 768 posts

Re: I'm sorry but I cannot fulfill this request it goes against OpenAI use policy

#331
post #65

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Why not have a separate chat request to apology-check the responses? Not my original idea, there was a link from HN where the dev did just that.

Sounds like a great way to double your API bills, and maybe that's worth it, but it seems pretty heavy-handed to me (and equally not 100% watertight).

Only allow one token to answer. Use logit bias to make "0" or "1" the most probable tokens. Ask it "Is this message an apology? Return 0 for no, 1 for yes." Feed it only the first 25 tokens of the message you're checking.

Re: I'm sorry but I cannot fulfill this request it goes against OpenAI use policy

#333

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'd really like a more 'curated' or vetted everything store. I don't need to see 40 of the same exact item rebranded into various English horrors. Walmart seems most primed to do this, barring third party sales. Or Sears, if they ever had a miraculous turnaround to their old days.

Amazon is just SO EASY though. It's a vortex I can't escape. I tried ordering a Nintendo Switch from Walmart for my son's birthday. 3 days they told me. It didn't even ship. The website said I could "try" to cancel the order. "Try" I did, and that try failed. I then waited a few weeks and had to call them up and they said oh we will just mark it as lost in transit. Oh yeah, that sounds perfect. They wasted my time, t…

I’m shocked that people are having good experiences with Amazon delivery in 2023. For me, 2-day delivery means it’ll get here in a week or 2. And forget about customer service that can actually solve my issue.

I want whatever program you’re on

Re: I'm sorry but I cannot fulfill this request it goes against OpenAI use policy

#334

Using Amazon for shopping is terrible, borderline unusable in 2024. They're hard to compete with because they're giant and have an amazing logistics network, but it also seems like there's a big vacuum in the market for an "everything store" that's actually good.

the problem is capitalism necessitates enshittification. you aren't getting a contender as long as the regulations are abhorrently lax about both the workers and the sellers. along with consumer rights. there just is no economic incentive to improve but rather dig the moat.

(1) Expand network of friends/family. (2) Buy only when you get a recommendation from friends/family. (3) profit? :)

Asking the government to create regulations for product quality just means that the lobbyists who actually write those regulations are going to fuck you over yet again.

Re: I'm sorry but I cannot fulfill this request it goes against OpenAI use policy

#335
post #92

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Sometimes. https://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/7702913.stm

I brought up translation as a risk with a friend. If you pay someone for a translation these days, there is a chance they will just feed it to some AI to cut costs. You'll have no way to validate yourself if you don't speak the language.

Do you usually just pick a person at random when hiring or do you spend some effort looking into their qualifications and references?

How's your hypothetical any different now than it would've been in the past 15 or so years of Google Translate's existence?

Re: I'm sorry but I cannot fulfill this request it goes against OpenAI use policy

#336
post #295

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Rebranded .. I'm getting really annoyed with the same product, different prices, different brand names apparently generated by some China-based anagram generator

But.. that's how a lot of products have always worked. I think the difference is that before a lot of white-label product factories would cut territory-based deals with resellers, so in (for example) the US, that widget is called "Acme Widget" but in France that exact same widget is called "Le Widget Magnifique". Around the world there might be 100+ companies selling that same product but typically not competing with…

The difference is that many big brands will vet the products before they put their name and warranty on it.

Amazon is a free for all when factories can just direclty dump their garbage. There is no brand recognition or reputation. It's all just random character strings attached to random products. If a QUENTOC dog leash is prone to snap and whiplash your face, they can just dump the brand and move on.

Re: I'm sorry but I cannot fulfill this request it goes against OpenAI use policy

#337
post #295

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Rebranded .. I'm getting really annoyed with the same product, different prices, different brand names apparently generated by some China-based anagram generator

But.. that's how a lot of products have always worked. I think the difference is that before a lot of white-label product factories would cut territory-based deals with resellers, so in (for example) the US, that widget is called "Acme Widget" but in France that exact same widget is called "Le Widget Magnifique". Around the world there might be 100+ companies selling that same product but typically not competing with…

Sure, but before it didn't bother me because I didn't have to browse through eight pages of search results that show the same four products over and over again with different brands slapped on before I might find a fifth one that suits my needs better. If you're lucky they're all using the same images, but sometimes there's a couple of variations so it takes you a couple seconds for each listing to figure out if it's one of the four you already seen a dozen times and don't want.

Re: I'm sorry but I cannot fulfill this request it goes against OpenAI use policy

#338

Using Amazon for shopping is terrible, borderline unusable in 2024. They're hard to compete with because they're giant and have an amazing logistics network, but it also seems like there's a big vacuum in the market for an "everything store" that's actually good.

> vacuum in the market for an "everything store" that's actually good. I would like a "what store is everything in" product. Search for something, and it gives you back matching products in stores 5/10/50 miles from you; purchase online, pickup from the store (or pay for an ubereats like delivery). As you build a cart, it attempts to cluster items. You get the convenience of search and online purchase, so that you do…

I think google still does this, but yes it’s probably very half-assed.

I think the real product there would be a universal inventory system for all stores. And small stores like local hardware stores might not have comprehensive inventory, so then you get in to things like inventory scanning robots.

Point being there’s several layers of missing pieces (I believe, I know next to nothing about retail) that make the top layer hard or impossible. Google for example is probably plugging in to APIs for a few large stores like target and Walmart and skipping all the little ones.

I guess another option is a store network that is a franchise model of one company. All the products come from that company but franchise owners decide what they actually stock and carry. So they could be a hardware store or a home goods store etc but it’s all one centralized system underneath. Each store has a standard fulfillment system so you can pick up in store or get things shipped.

Alternatively it would be nice to see an Amazon style store but everything is vetted as decent quality. Problem is it’s just hard to keep up with the flow of new goods from overseas showing up on Amazon and if you’re going to vet items for quality that’s going to add overhead. I guess that’s basically what stores like Target do.

Post reply on HN