Live data from Hacker News

eBay pays $3M fine in blogger harassment case

bbc.com

21–30 of 146 posts

Re: eBay pays $3M fine in blogger harassment case

#21
post #9

Earlier quoted context omitted.

To this day I cannot accept that A+ is better than A-. Clearly the ordering is increasing in value with each letter and so a smaller value is better, and “-“ / minus gives you a slightly smaller value. We accept that “A” comes before “B” so therefore “A” is better. “A-“ is smaller than “A” therefore “A-“ must be better! rank = [A- A A+ B- B B+ C- …]

> Clearly the ordering is increasing in value Here's your mistake. Alphabet ordering is decreasing in value.

Yes you are right but I think you’ve found a bug with my cack handed description of my logic, not with the logic itself!

We value things highly by assigning them symbols with low values, so a symbol with a postfix modifier that gives it a slightly lower value means we value it higher! Or something :)

Re: eBay pays $3M fine in blogger harassment case

#23

Curious, how were the executives caught? How was it proven that the harassment came from the executives?

Ah, answering my own question in case others are interested. Seems the bloggers were being followed by a van at one point and they were able to get the plates, which ultimately linked back to ebay. I keep being impressed by ai's ability to perform research for you. "Found" the answer here: https://www.phind.com/search?cache=xzz0am8o9ruxo4wztcc4v7xp

First time I hear of "phind", nice that it shows the sources on one side, and the summary/answer on the other.

I wonder if the sources it lists are completely authoritative to its answer (i.e. the answer adds no new/hallucinated stuff that's not in the sources), or whether the sources are just "relevant".

Re: eBay pays $3M fine in blogger harassment case

#24
post #13

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I wonder what the rules on sending live specimens through the post are. Knowingly not using the right markings on the package can cause issues. When they ask you if you have any of "these" things in the package and you then say no would be a federal crime. Messing with the postal inspectors tends to be wildly underappreciated at the repercussions they can inflict.

The rules: https://pe.usps.com/text/pub52/pub52c5_008.htm

My father was a rural letter carrier and I can 100% confirm that live bees and live chicks are sent USPS.

Re: eBay pays $3M fine in blogger harassment case

#27
post #17
post #4

What's more surprising to me is seeing a story about Ebay that shows the date 2024 rather than 2004

eBay is the second largest eCommerce site by sales behind Amazon. They sell more new merchandise than used these days.

First is Aliexpress

Amazon is 2nd

eBay is third

Re: eBay pays $3M fine in blogger harassment case

#28

> The acts of intimidation included sending live insects, a foetal pig and a funeral wreath to the Steiners' home in Natick, Massachusetts. If someone I knew claimed that eBay execs were sending them things like this I wouldn’t believe them. It’s like something from a TV show.

Oh it just gets crazier from there. They flew to their city and stalked them for days, gps tracked their car etc etc

Re: eBay pays $3M fine in blogger harassment case

#29

> The acts of intimidation included sending live insects, a foetal pig and a funeral wreath to the Steiners' home in Natick, Massachusetts. If someone I knew claimed that eBay execs were sending them things like this I wouldn’t believe them. It’s like something from a TV show.

Oh it just gets crazier from there. They flew to their city and stalked them for days, gps tracked their car etc etc

Sounds like regular stimulant abuser behavior to me

Re: eBay pays $3M fine in blogger harassment case

#30
post #13

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The rules: https://pe.usps.com/text/pub52/pub52c5_008.htm

My father was a rural letter carrier and I can 100% confirm that live bees and live chicks are sent USPS.

I think you guys are missing the actually comment.

The question isn't "can you send live animals" the question is "what happens if I sent a live/dead animal and _don't_ tell USPS". That question is not answered by the section (?) 526 rules [1].

[1]: https://pe.usps.com/text/pub52/pub52c5_008.htm

Post reply on HN