Earlier quoted context omitted.
That’s a fun site.
Crypto is a scam (including Bitcoin) anybody treating it otherwise is overly credulous or in on the scam. Maybe it started out with better intentions but it is irredeemable.
SEC has not approved Bitcoin ETFs [fixed]
371–380 of 518 posts
Re: SEC has not approved Bitcoin ETFs [fixed]
#372Re: SEC has not approved Bitcoin ETFs [fixed]
#373I have never looked at BTC as a quick trading rather a long investment, I still have many BTC since 2010 and never sold it.
Re: SEC has not approved Bitcoin ETFs [fixed]
#374Earlier quoted context omitted.
it’s also not a particularly good way to send money from one person to another
It's absolutely the fastest way to send larger sums of money.
Re: SEC has not approved Bitcoin ETFs [fixed]
#375Earlier quoted context omitted.
An irreversible permissionless way to send funds near-instantaneously to anyone anywhere in the world is pretty darn good at a lot of perfectly legal use cases. My personal favorite example is that I once used Bitcoin for an emergency so my (then-homeless) friend could receive cash in hands from a Bitcoin ATM, in a matter of less than 1 hour, on a Sunday, while I was vacationing remote. Nothing, and I truly mean it b…
Can do this for free in Canada with Interac as long as both parties have Canadian bank accounts. But for international transfer theres not a good solution AFAIK. Bitcoin ATMs are an interesting example because they involve at least one trusted third party - the Bitcoin ATM operator.
Re: SEC has not approved Bitcoin ETFs [fixed]
#376Re: SEC has not approved Bitcoin ETFs [fixed]
#377This is icing on the cake of this manipulated attempt to restart the crypto craze. These morons are so greedy that they undermine themselves.
Re: SEC has not approved Bitcoin ETFs [fixed]
#378Re: SEC has not approved Bitcoin ETFs [fixed]
#379This is so wild. Assuming it was financially motivated, wouldn't the involved party stand to benefit more by shorting and posting that the ETF was denied?
Re: SEC has not approved Bitcoin ETFs [fixed]
#380Earlier quoted context omitted.
Because it's their account?
Fraud is the fault of the one being impersonated now?