Earlier quoted context omitted.
> an ETF would make it a lot easier to buy Bitcoin How? Serious question. What would it enable that hasn't already been possible for many years now?
It'll be marginable in a normal brokerage account
SEC has not approved Bitcoin ETFs [fixed]
171–180 of 518 posts
Re: SEC has not approved Bitcoin ETFs [fixed]
#172Earlier quoted context omitted.
https://help.twitter.com/en/rules-and-policies/profile-label... "The grey checkmark indicates that an account represents a government/multilateral organization or a government/multilateral official. Eligibility criteria to receive a complimentary grey checkmark are listed below. Additional government and multilateral accounts can receive grey checkmarks through Verified Organizations. Eligible government organization…
Thanks for the quote! Lol, I can't believe this is really what they ended up with: multicolored stars to indicate different things? I thought it was a joke at first, but no, that's really how it works now. What a strange world...
What's the issue with it?
Re: SEC has not approved Bitcoin ETFs [fixed]
#173Earlier quoted context omitted.
Barely makes an impression in the parade of crime that is web3isgoinggreat.com/
Can you explain how web3 is responsible for all the crypto nonsense for a layman?
Re: SEC has not approved Bitcoin ETFs [fixed]
#174The price of BTC initially jumped 3% on the hacked tweet. That's $25bn+ of market cap. The irony is the SEC itself is probably now responsible for the largest crypto pump and dump in history.
Who cares about $25bn? These guys hacked the SEC, made huge announcement tweet, and only got a 3% move from that. More over, they only had a 10 minute window to close whatever positions they had before BTC crashed through it's pre-hack price. There is a fair chance that they actually lost money on this play, lol.
Re: SEC has not approved Bitcoin ETFs [fixed]
#175Earlier quoted context omitted.
The old crypto chants were that crypto would lead us away from the ills of traditional markets/finance. Glad to see that it's been watered down to "just as bad as" arguments.
Tomorrow your bank could cut you off from your own money because you protested the government[1], and what could you possibly do? Having the freedom to truly own your own money and investments is valuable in and of itself, no matter how much crypto "devolves" towards traditional finance in other regards. [1]: https://www.nytimes.com/2022/02/22/world/americas/canada-pro...
Re: SEC has not approved Bitcoin ETFs [fixed]
#176Earlier quoted context omitted.
Barely makes an impression in the parade of crime that is web3isgoinggreat.com/
Can you explain how web3 is responsible for all the crypto nonsense for a layman?
Re: SEC has not approved Bitcoin ETFs [fixed]
#177Earlier quoted context omitted.
The old crypto chants were that crypto would lead us away from the ills of traditional markets/finance. Glad to see that it's been watered down to "just as bad as" arguments.
Tomorrow your bank could cut you off from your own money because you protested the government[1], and what could you possibly do? Having the freedom to truly own your own money and investments is valuable in and of itself, no matter how much crypto "devolves" towards traditional finance in other regards. [1]: https://www.nytimes.com/2022/02/22/world/americas/canada-pro...
Re: SEC has not approved Bitcoin ETFs [fixed]
#178Re: SEC has not approved Bitcoin ETFs [fixed]
#179Earlier quoted context omitted.
Tomorrow your bank could cut you off from your own money because you protested the government[1], and what could you possibly do? Having the freedom to truly own your own money and investments is valuable in and of itself, no matter how much crypto "devolves" towards traditional finance in other regards. [1]: https://www.nytimes.com/2022/02/22/world/americas/canada-pro...
Instead, you can lose access to your money just because you forgot your secret key.
The other, not so much.
Plenty of downsides to crypto no doubt, but I'm not sure "personal responsibility" is one of them.