Live data from Hacker News

How meta built the infrastructure for Threads

engineering.fb.com

111–120 of 184 posts

Re: How meta built the infrastructure for Threads

#111

Earlier quoted context omitted.

My threads feed started OK at launch but now is a wasteland of pointless rage bait and r/antiwork style content. I'm sure it's popular but it's not what I want to read. On X I get mostly informative ML and robotics content. Of course it took some curation and liberal use of the "Mute Words" feature to get there. But I just don't think that content is there on Threads. My go-to example of why I don't like what's happe…

> wasteland of pointless rage bait This was also my experience.

My only interaction with threads is through suggested posts from Instagram. I think I made the mistake of clicking on one to see what stupid thing someone was claiming. That is all it shows me now. Frustrating for multiple reasons.

Why do people enjoy this stuff.

Re: How meta built the infrastructure for Threads

#112

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I live in a democracy. The government didn't pop into existence by manifestation of an unseen will, the society in which I live elected them. If people voted for a government that is butt buddies with the large corporations that exploit society through lobbying and regulatory capture, then the values of that society are already represented, and everyone compromised into unethical corporations having their way. What i…

It's comments like these that make me more afraid of AI, because I notice how many people behave or reason like bots, following a script.

I'll take this as a compliment, human.

Re: How meta built the infrastructure for Threads

#113
post #39

Offtopic but here we go: Once Threads became available in the EU I, like I assume many others, made an Instagram account from my FB account in order to check it out. 2 days later, and without having posted anything except perhaps a "Hello world", my Insta account was banned for generic reason (breaking the TOS, nothing concrete). I only found out 2 weeks later, as I hadn't even visited the site(s) again. Their "Appea…

[deleted]

Re: How meta built the infrastructure for Threads

#115

I'm kinda loving the obvious "X" shills in the comments coming just to declare Threads dead. It is literally the 2nd most downloaded app in the AppStore (was #1 for a bit, but Temu is seemingly unstoppable). Personally, it has become my preferred social media platform. It's overflowing with content and I check in on it several times a day, and have been really enjoying the community that is emerging. It DOES however…

[deleted]

Re: How meta built the infrastructure for Threads

#117

Earlier quoted context omitted.

My threads feed started OK at launch but now is a wasteland of pointless rage bait and r/antiwork style content. I'm sure it's popular but it's not what I want to read. On X I get mostly informative ML and robotics content. Of course it took some curation and liberal use of the "Mute Words" feature to get there. But I just don't think that content is there on Threads. My go-to example of why I don't like what's happe…

Isn't the same true for twitter nowadays?

It depends entirely on how well you've managed your follows, likes, and comments to train the algorithm.

Only NPCs expect good, uplifting content to be handed to them without work.

This applies to both X and Threads.

Re: How meta built the infrastructure for Threads

#118

I'm kinda loving the obvious "X" shills in the comments coming just to declare Threads dead. It is literally the 2nd most downloaded app in the AppStore (was #1 for a bit, but Temu is seemingly unstoppable). Personally, it has become my preferred social media platform. It's overflowing with content and I check in on it several times a day, and have been really enjoying the community that is emerging. It DOES however…

Please don't post insinuations about astroturfing, shilling, brigading, foreign agents, and the like. It degrades discussion and is usually mistaken.

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

Re: How meta built the infrastructure for Threads

#119

I'm kinda loving the obvious "X" shills in the comments coming just to declare Threads dead. It is literally the 2nd most downloaded app in the AppStore (was #1 for a bit, but Temu is seemingly unstoppable). Personally, it has become my preferred social media platform. It's overflowing with content and I check in on it several times a day, and have been really enjoying the community that is emerging. It DOES however…

I wanted Threads to work but have given up on it, visiting occasionally for a couple of AI-related accounts and that's it. All the constant hype about its download counts hasn't remotely correlated with actual worthwhile content. There is little NFL or F1 content there (lots of players created accounts and then abandoned it), tech content is largely masturbatory "look we're Tech Threads" type content, etc.

And to be clear, I deleted my Twitter account shortly after Musk's purchase. I'm not an X "shill", though to offer the counterpoint when I see someone "shilling" Threads I assume they have some iota of success there and really, really want it to be a thing so they'll constantly tell you all about how it ranks in downloads.

Thread's algorithms are absolutely fetid garbage. Despite following a couple hundred good accounts and trying to like content I enjoyed, my for you was endlessly filled with almost an inverse set of what I want to see. I didn't engage these posts but instead would just mute/block copiously. It would redouble the same. "Tech" Threads recently has been 100% occupied with Meta employees bitching and whining about Apple, which grows super old. I could switch to Following, but so few people actually post there that it's just sadness, and the few who do post frequently are so obviously desperate to try to make a social media "presence" that it's just...the opposite of not cringey. And again it is shocking how much content on Threads is about Threads, or about Twitter. It's just incredibly boring.

And this is the honeymoon period! If this is the best it can offer, what happens when Meta starts actually turning the screws?

Re: How meta built the infrastructure for Threads

#120

What do folks use for something like Meta’s Async? RabbitMQ? > The workloads commonly executed on Async are those that do not require blocking an active user’s experience with a product and can be performed anywhere from a few seconds to several hours after a user’s action.

Sounds like something you could do with SQS and Lambda. They just have massive datacenter infra and compute at disposal.
Post reply on HN