Scotia, California is owned by a New York investment firm
11–20 of 81 posts
Re: Scotia, California is owned by a New York investment firm
#12They put a lot of money into a town that might sink or flood into a swamp.
Re: Scotia, California is owned by a New York investment firm
#13So this is an ad for the investment firm's properties?
Re: Scotia, California is owned by a New York investment firm
#14It never was a town. None of the lots were platted, subdivided, taxed individually, etc.
Re: Scotia, California is owned by a New York investment firm
#15Earlier quoted context omitted.
The Walt Disney Company does. I realize the shorthand is valid, but it just reads like Walt is still alive. I guess I’m being pedantic for my own sake…
Being even more pedantic, he maybe still is, by some definition.
You're going to have to explain that one. My first guess is you mean his legacy but a man's legacy is not the same as his life.
Re: Scotia, California is owned by a New York investment firm
#16Scotia, CA. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scotia,_California It is a “company town”, but it is not incorporated. You can also find a company town near you: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_company_towns_in_the_U...
I’d add Sinclair, WY to that list. I stumbled upon it while driving cross country. It’s kinda surreal.
Re: Scotia, California is owned by a New York investment firm
#17Scotia, CA. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scotia,_California It is a “company town”, but it is not incorporated. You can also find a company town near you: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_company_towns_in_the_U...
I’d add Sinclair, WY to that list. I stumbled upon it while driving cross country. It’s kinda surreal.
It's Wikipedia. Go ahead and add it. :)
Re: Scotia, California is owned by a New York investment firm
#18Earlier quoted context omitted.
Being even more pedantic, he maybe still is, by some definition.
You're going to have to explain that one. My first guess is you mean his legacy but a man's legacy is not the same as his life.
There's a popular rumor that he froze his head in anticipation of being revived in the future
Re: Scotia, California is owned by a New York investment firm
#19Earlier quoted context omitted.
You're going to have to explain that one. My first guess is you mean his legacy but a man's legacy is not the same as his life.
There's a popular rumor that he froze his head in anticipation of being revived in the future
Ah. Let's generously say that did happen and it works out for him at some indeterminate point in the future.
Would you then consider the frozen and completely inactive head disconnected from a living body vital for sustaining the living processes of the head of Walt Disney still living in the present? If this thread is to be completely pedantic, we have to go all the way here.
Re: Scotia, California is owned by a New York investment firm
#20Earlier quoted context omitted.
Being even more pedantic, he maybe still is, by some definition.
You're going to have to explain that one. My first guess is you mean his legacy but a man's legacy is not the same as his life.