Earlier quoted context omitted.
So in its initial form it is indeed a complete waste of tax payers money. Shocking.
Absolutist takes like this never achieve much. Yes, it could be better. But an mvp-type launch that does some things well, without trying to achieve everything on day one, would definitely not be a "complete waste". If successful, it's laying the base for the next iterations of functionality. For a lot of folks, they have one or two W2 forms to enter, and that's it. It's really not that hard. If even a million or so…
IRS to begin trial of its own free tax-filing system
61–70 of 338 posts
Re: IRS to begin trial of its own free tax-filing system
#62Earlier quoted context omitted.
Not only will they, but Trump's Secretary of Treasury will order the IRS to cancel the program as soon as he's elected.
Why? Trump is a populist. "Get your taxes done with me for free instead of HR Block charging you a couple hundreds" is a low-hanging fruit.
Re: IRS to begin trial of its own free tax-filing system
#63For reference, Arizona, California, Florida, Massachusetts, Nevada, New Hampshire, New York, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Washington State and Wyoming are participating.
This whole system stinks. The overly complicated tax code, the sleazy corporations making tons of money on it, the entrenched politicians and bureacrats who make a living on it, etc.
Re: IRS to begin trial of its own free tax-filing system
#64Earlier quoted context omitted.
Which is really the main issue. Offering a more accessible free version to file taxes is great, but the real problem is the need to file taxes at all for a lot of people. The IRS already knows the relevant info: Your employer sends W-2 information, your bank and broker are sending the various 1099 forms for interest, dividends, stock sale gains/losses, etc. Same for your spouse and kids/dependents. Don't even need to…
That is how it works in many (most?) countries already - the US is an outlier in requiring every citizen to handle their own taxes.
Re: IRS to begin trial of its own free tax-filing system
#65Earlier quoted context omitted.
Not only will they, but Trump's Secretary of Treasury will order the IRS to cancel the program as soon as he's elected.
Why? Trump is a populist. "Get your taxes done with me for free instead of HR Block charging you a couple hundreds" is a low-hanging fruit.
Re: IRS to begin trial of its own free tax-filing system
#66Earlier quoted context omitted.
This is why we still have the income tax system that we do. It’s a $14 billion a year industry. I’ve talked to people who work the lobbying system very hard. There’s lots of wining and dining to make sure no one messes with the complexity of the system. We need more people who are immune to lobbying in government positions. We’ll see how this goes.. depending on the next election cycle this will either get quashed qu…
Which is really the main issue. Offering a more accessible free version to file taxes is great, but the real problem is the need to file taxes at all for a lot of people. The IRS already knows the relevant info: Your employer sends W-2 information, your bank and broker are sending the various 1099 forms for interest, dividends, stock sale gains/losses, etc. Same for your spouse and kids/dependents. Don't even need to…
I imagine there are heavy software development costs, on par with what it might take to build Turbotax itself.
For instance, someone is going to have to figure out wash sales. Right now your broker does it, but you can wash sale across accounts, which requires you (or more reasonably tax software) to both detect this and track the adjusted basis in perpetuity. More complex events, like straddles, further exist, and even consumer-grade tax software won't handle it correctly.
Even implementing the tax code correctly for regular income is difficult. Examples of calculating Net investment income tax correctly due to ambiguous tax code changes (https://www.bogleheads.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=271074&...)
Re: IRS to begin trial of its own free tax-filing system
#67Earlier quoted context omitted.
Which is really the main issue. Offering a more accessible free version to file taxes is great, but the real problem is the need to file taxes at all for a lot of people. The IRS already knows the relevant info: Your employer sends W-2 information, your bank and broker are sending the various 1099 forms for interest, dividends, stock sale gains/losses, etc. Same for your spouse and kids/dependents. Don't even need to…
That is how it works in many (most?) countries already - the US is an outlier in requiring every citizen to handle their own taxes.
There are also cheap systems even for business returns - mine cost £12 for the company and I will use the free HMRC system for my personal return. It might be easier to use more sophisticated software, especially if your finances are complex.
Re: IRS to begin trial of its own free tax-filing system
#68For reference, Arizona, California, Florida, Massachusetts, Nevada, New Hampshire, New York, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Washington State and Wyoming are participating.
For those who don't know, of those 12 states, only 4 actually have income taxes. The other 8 do not. This whole system stinks. The overly complicated tax code, the sleazy corporations making tons of money on it, the entrenched politicians and bureacrats who make a living on it, etc.
Although if the IRS is gonna audit when I under pay, they technically already know how much I owe. Why not just tell me? Reckon it's since people also over pay, and there's no refunds for doing that.
Re: IRS to begin trial of its own free tax-filing system
#69Re: IRS to begin trial of its own free tax-filing system
#70I have a hard time understanding why the IRS doesn't at least have a basic web portal for individuals and businesses to do simple things like update addresses, send secure correspondence, check on the status of correspondence, file forms electronically, etc. A lot of paper forms and letters, human resources and time could be saved with such a system, even if it doesn't actually provide for any tax computations itself…
The answer is a combination of industry lobbying (see elsewhere in this thread) and partisan politics that result in deliberately under-funding the IRS (for a general notion, see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Starve_the_beast , and for more directly relevant events see https://www.propublica.org/article/how-the-irs-was-gutted )