Exactly. You can't just add up the "debts" or "liabilities" side of the ledger and say, "guy is $1B in debt". You also have to include the assets side of the ledger. If his debts are balanced by assets, then he isn't (net) in debt at all; he's levered.
Granted, leverage can be dangerous -- if the assets evaporate, then you can be in trouble.
But I wonder even about that in this case. Does he personally have $1B in loans? Or does he control companies with $1B in debts? If the latter, then if push comes to shove, those companies can go bankrupt, and he's probably still fine, I imagine.
(Hm. I guess a highly levered company has a very "convex" return profile, like a call option.)
So I agree. If somebody is going to do a story on how Robert Kiyosaki uses debt, they should do this accounting and figure out how much he is personally liable for. And how the assets balance the liabilities.
Not that I'm particularly a fan of the guy, to want to defend him. I've listened to him speak and he says nothing.
As for his assets -- he's talking about physical silver and oil wells? This sounds like cranky goldbug stuff. But what do I know.