Show HN: CursusDB – A new scalable distributed document oriented database
1–10 of 70 posts
Re: Show HN: CursusDB – A new scalable distributed document oriented database
#2Re: Show HN: CursusDB – A new scalable distributed document oriented database
#3I read the title as CursorDB, which would have made a nice DB name.
Re: Show HN: CursusDB – A new scalable distributed document oriented database
#4For new products I always recommend the same thing: name your competitors and use cases. Compare them in a table; don't make the user think. Who should and should not use your product? Being in-memory and distributed, I imagine your competitors include Ignite and Hazelcast? I read the title as CursorDB, which would have made a nice DB name.
Re: Show HN: CursusDB – A new scalable distributed document oriented database
#5For new products I always recommend the same thing: name your competitors and use cases. Compare them in a table; don't make the user think. Who should and should not use your product? Being in-memory and distributed, I imagine your competitors include Ignite and Hazelcast? I read the title as CursorDB, which would have made a nice DB name.
Re: Show HN: CursusDB – A new scalable distributed document oriented database
#6For new products I always recommend the same thing: name your competitors and use cases. Compare them in a table; don't make the user think. Who should and should not use your product? Being in-memory and distributed, I imagine your competitors include Ignite and Hazelcast? I read the title as CursorDB, which would have made a nice DB name.
Re: Show HN: CursusDB – A new scalable distributed document oriented database
#7For new products I always recommend the same thing: name your competitors and use cases. Compare them in a table; don't make the user think. Who should and should not use your product? Being in-memory and distributed, I imagine your competitors include Ignite and Hazelcast? I read the title as CursorDB, which would have made a nice DB name.
Hi esafak. I don't really care for competitors. In regards to use cases there are so many! Currently I am working on few tutorials on how to build different applications like a Hackernews clone with a real-time frontend. These tutorials are to bring light to the functionalities of the database and give users ideas. Yeah I don't know those companies, nor do I care to. I built and designed the database the way I wanted…
Re: Show HN: CursusDB – A new scalable distributed document oriented database
#8For new products I always recommend the same thing: name your competitors and use cases. Compare them in a table; don't make the user think. Who should and should not use your product? Being in-memory and distributed, I imagine your competitors include Ignite and Hazelcast? I read the title as CursorDB, which would have made a nice DB name.
Good point, my first thought is, why wouldn't I just use Couchbase? It is proven and has a community around it.
Re: Show HN: CursusDB – A new scalable distributed document oriented database
#9Earlier quoted context omitted.
Hi esafak. I don't really care for competitors. In regards to use cases there are so many! Currently I am working on few tutorials on how to build different applications like a Hackernews clone with a real-time frontend. These tutorials are to bring light to the functionalities of the database and give users ideas. Yeah I don't know those companies, nor do I care to. I built and designed the database the way I wanted…
You have competitors whether you like it or not -- unless you don't care for users, either. A sibling commenter asked "Why not just use Couchbase?" If your answer is "figure it out yourself; I already wrote documentation" you are shooting yourself in the foot. Documentation is not marketing. Marketing means helping potential users understand why they should use your product rather than something similar.
Re: Show HN: CursusDB – A new scalable distributed document oriented database
#10For new products I always recommend the same thing: name your competitors and use cases. Compare them in a table; don't make the user think. Who should and should not use your product? Being in-memory and distributed, I imagine your competitors include Ignite and Hazelcast? I read the title as CursorDB, which would have made a nice DB name.