Live data from Hacker News

Block cookie banners on Firefox

support.mozilla.org

81–90 of 103 posts

Re: Block cookie banners on Firefox

#81

> For example, they might make the Accept All Cookies button prominent, colorful and appealing, while burying the Customize Settings option in small text or a less noticeable location. This design choice can be misleading, effectively nudging users towards accepting all cookies without considering the consequences. Kind of burying the lede there that this isn't just annoying, it's illegal.

However, the various DPAs have been completely useless at actually enforcing its regulation, as if there wasn't actually any will to enforce it due to vested interests.

Re: Block cookie banners on Firefox

#82
post #69

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I always get downvoted for saying this but I think the cookie banners broke taboos about intrusive and annoying pop-ups in web sites. There was a time the tech and design oriented people could fight against it for the users but once it was required or maybe “socially positive” it got much harder to fight against all the others so you find the blogs now that will interrupt you three times to give your email and such.…

The annoying thing is: it is not required by GDPR. You can provide whatever the user wants to do. Recommendations? Sure. If you want them. The required data collection is then just.... Required. It is tied to this purpose though and can't be used e.g. for ads. But it is not OK to collect everything about the user so you can charge more for ads or to sell ("exchange") that information. Which is in 99% of cases the rea…

Why didn't they just ask some human factors people about it and come to some solution like: "if you don't respect Do Not Track you go to jail"?

Re: Block cookie banners on Firefox

#83

Earlier quoted context omitted.

We’ve had far more annoying pop ups and banners since the 90s. One of Opera’s primary selling points at one time was its popup blocking capabilities and that was in the 90s or latest in the 2001/2002 timeframe from what I can remember.

He's not saying that cookie banners were the first pop up. He's saying that you can delineate a before time and an after time that is delineated by the cookie banners. Before: pop ups were bad and browsers would advertise about how they defeated pop ups. After: pop ups are acceptable and you're bad if you want to defeat them.

I remember the popup (e.g. new browser window) crisis circa 2000. Those were easy to stop because the behavior is easy for a browser to identify so browsers can't open popups if the action wasn't initiated by a user event handler and can open only so many in that condition.

Banners, modal dialogs and other kinds of "new popups" in general are a bit tougher. Usually there is some element you could remove from the DOM tree or display: none but the trouble is knowing which element!

Re: Block cookie banners on Firefox

#84
post #21

The EU forcing this garbage is one of the worst things to happen to the web.

The EU didn't actually force cookie banners; they're not the only route to GDPR compliance. The other routes - like only using necessary cookies - were just unacceptable to ad/tracking companies.

To be fair, the EU does bear the fault in that its regulation is not enforced enough. The GDPR actually forbids annoying users into consent (it doesn't count if you force or trick users into consenting) but enforcement of this has been so lacking that entire businesses like TrustArc have been built on providing non-GDPR-compliant consent flows.

Re: Block cookie banners on Firefox

#85
post #66

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The EU didn't actually force cookie banners; they're not the only route to GDPR compliance. The other routes - like only using necessary cookies - were just unacceptable to ad/tracking companies.

EU is law is so bad that Wikipedia has a cookie banner. It literally bans all non functional cookies unless the users consents like preference cookies, performance monitoring cookies etc. I am sure all their government sites violate their own rules because i see preference cookies getting dropped without my consent and if I block the cookie, site still works.

> preference cookies

This would count as a functional cookie.

> performance monitoring cookies

Your web server doesn't need a cookie to tell you how long it took to process my request.

Re: Block cookie banners on Firefox

#86
post #33

Highly recommend the Consent-O-Matic extension to automatically handle cookie prompts, too: https://github.com/cavi-au/Consent-O-Matic . One of my favourite extensions.

Seconded this, and on Firefox, the extension is also available on Firefox Android now https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/consent-o-mat...

Re: Block cookie banners on Firefox

#87

uBlock Origin has a few lists for cookie banners that I always keep on [0][1] [0] https://github.com/easylist/easylist/tree/master/easylist_co... [1] https://github.com/AdguardTeam/AdguardFilters/tree/master/An...

I upvoted but wanted to say Thank You. This is very useful for me personally, and materially improves my life.

You're very welcome! The list maintainers and uBlock Origin folks really are amazing people.

Re: Block cookie banners on Firefox

#88
post #2

Funny, I use the "I still don't care about cookies" extension ( https://github.com/OhMyGuus/I-Still-Dont-Care-About-Cookies ) right now to automatically accept the cookie banners. They're literally one of the most annoying things that has happened in the web's history

I've used this extension for a long time, but there are actually websites like CNN that don't work with it now, because according to their lawyers they have to show that banner to everyone from the EU.

Or they could just not track people... ;-)

Re: Block cookie banners on Firefox

#89
post #69

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I always get downvoted for saying this but I think the cookie banners broke taboos about intrusive and annoying pop-ups in web sites. There was a time the tech and design oriented people could fight against it for the users but once it was required or maybe “socially positive” it got much harder to fight against all the others so you find the blogs now that will interrupt you three times to give your email and such.…

The annoying thing is: it is not required by GDPR. You can provide whatever the user wants to do. Recommendations? Sure. If you want them. The required data collection is then just.... Required. It is tied to this purpose though and can't be used e.g. for ads. But it is not OK to collect everything about the user so you can charge more for ads or to sell ("exchange") that information. Which is in 99% of cases the rea…

How are you able to recommend content to a user without having previously asked for consent?

Either you have no data and so no information to tune your recommendations or you have data in which case you needed to request for consent

Re: Block cookie banners on Firefox

#90
post #89
post #69

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The annoying thing is: it is not required by GDPR. You can provide whatever the user wants to do. Recommendations? Sure. If you want them. The required data collection is then just.... Required. It is tied to this purpose though and can't be used e.g. for ads. But it is not OK to collect everything about the user so you can charge more for ads or to sell ("exchange") that information. Which is in 99% of cases the rea…

How are you able to recommend content to a user without having previously asked for consent? Either you have no data and so no information to tune your recommendations or you have data in which case you needed to request for consent

Or you can recommend content related to what's on the page. Same way TV & other traditional ads tend to work, since they can't track users.
Post reply on HN