Live data from Hacker News

New Ultra Fast Lossless Audio Codec (HALAC)

hydrogenaud.io

121–130 of 201 posts

Re: New Ultra Fast Lossless Audio Codec (HALAC)

#121
post #8

For what looks at first glance to be a potentially impactful development, this post and the "encode.su" one linked from it are extremely sparse on details. Where is the source code? A detailed description of what the codec actually does? References to relevant publications? All I see are two mystery Windows binaries, hosted on a forum I've never heard about. The fact that "encode.su" uses the world's most notorious d…

[deleted]

Re: New Ultra Fast Lossless Audio Codec (HALAC)

#126

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You are right about this. But there are things I should add to Halic and Halac. When I complete them and realize that it will really be used by someones, it will of course be open source.

> When I complete them and realize that it will really be used by someones, it will of course be open source There is a chicken and egg problem with this strategy: Few people will want to, or even be able to, use this unless it’s open source and freely licensed. The alternatives are mature, open or mostly open, and widely implemented. Minor improvements in speed aren’t enough to get everyone to put up with any diffic…

Hakan: if you are going to go open source just do it now. You have nothing to gain and much to lose by keeping it closed.

Re: New Ultra Fast Lossless Audio Codec (HALAC)

#127

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You are right about this. But there are things I should add to Halic and Halac. When I complete them and realize that it will really be used by someones, it will of course be open source.

> When I complete them and realize that it will really be used by someones, it will of course be open source There is a chicken and egg problem with this strategy: Few people will want to, or even be able to, use this unless it’s open source and freely licensed. The alternatives are mature, open or mostly open, and widely implemented. Minor improvements in speed aren’t enough to get everyone to put up with any diffic…

Maybe he is just waiting for the right investor that has a purpose for the codec so he can reinburse his time investment.

Making it opensource now would just ruin that leverage.

I am with you OP

Re: New Ultra Fast Lossless Audio Codec (HALAC)

#128

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> When I complete them and realize that it will really be used by someones, it will of course be open source There is a chicken and egg problem with this strategy: Few people will want to, or even be able to, use this unless it’s open source and freely licensed. The alternatives are mature, open or mostly open, and widely implemented. Minor improvements in speed aren’t enough to get everyone to put up with any diffic…

Maybe he is just waiting for the right investor that has a purpose for the codec so he can reinburse his time investment. Making it opensource now would just ruin that leverage. I am with you OP

Looking at history, it seems trying to build a business model around a codec doesn't tend to work out very well. It's not clear what the investor would be investing in. It's a better horse.

Re: New Ultra Fast Lossless Audio Codec (HALAC)

#130

Novel, but until it's open source, it will never be taken seriously.

There are things I should add to Halic and Halac. When I complete them and realize that it will really be used by someones, it will of course be open source.

This is a bad take man, "when its done" will never come having read through your comments on this you seem to really be going for some perfection in your hobby and until thats released won't release, but the issue is that rarely if ever happens, and instead of getting insights on your code and the community and yourself actually improving the landscape it's basically just a fancy exe, that no one will use actually because theres no where for it to go except in your head.
Post reply on HN