Hamlet: A type-safe Haml template engine for Go
1–10 of 42 posts
Re: Hamlet: A type-safe Haml template engine for Go
#2Skimming over the README page, it reminds me of PHP from back in the day.
Re: Hamlet: A type-safe Haml template engine for Go
#3I appreciate that in JSX, functions can be used as if they were first-class elements.
In this case that would be accomplished by supporting the following instead:
@hmlt HomePage() {
%SiteLayout
%p This is the home page for Hamlet.
}
Re: Hamlet: A type-safe Haml template engine for Go
#4The example has left me with a strong impression I should avoid this and HAML. That syntax frightens me.
Re: Hamlet: A type-safe Haml template engine for Go
#5The example has left me with a strong impression I should avoid this and HAML. That syntax frightens me.
SLIM is similar, but a bit cleaner: https://github.com/mattn/go-slim
Both SLIM and HAML resemble a DOM tree, it looks somewhat similar to what you would see in the browser inspector.
Re: Hamlet: A type-safe Haml template engine for Go
#6That's great; Haml is one thing I like most when doing web development on Ruby/Rails. The only thing I don't like about this implementation is the blocks with inline code:
- if user != nil {
%strong The user exists
- }Re: Hamlet: A type-safe Haml template engine for Go
#7The example has left me with a strong impression I should avoid this and HAML. That syntax frightens me.
SLIM is similar, but a bit cleaner: https://github.com/mattn/go-slim Both SLIM and HAML resemble a DOM tree, it looks somewhat similar to what you would see in the browser inspector.
Is HTML really that scary for people?
Re: Hamlet: A type-safe Haml template engine for Go
#8The example has left me with a strong impression I should avoid this and HAML. That syntax frightens me.
It looks unnecessary. The syntax is ugly and by looking at the examples I can’t say what problem it is supposed to solve.
Re: Hamlet: A type-safe Haml template engine for Go
#9Earlier quoted context omitted.
SLIM is similar, but a bit cleaner: https://github.com/mattn/go-slim Both SLIM and HAML resemble a DOM tree, it looks somewhat similar to what you would see in the browser inspector.
Is HTML really that scary for people?
I haven't seen many projects where people attempt to use SLIM templates as an alternative to HTML; rather, they are used as a complement. SLIM is for deeply nested structures and layouts, while HTML is for actual content.
Re: Hamlet: A type-safe Haml template engine for Go
#10Earlier quoted context omitted.
SLIM is similar, but a bit cleaner: https://github.com/mattn/go-slim Both SLIM and HAML resemble a DOM tree, it looks somewhat similar to what you would see in the browser inspector.
Is HTML really that scary for people?
HTML isn’t a templating language like HAML or Slim are.