Earlier quoted context omitted.
I'm not sure I buy his reasoning there. He said that he uploads a video every week which is a brisk pace. Why not a video every month? Every quarter? Perhaps he really just wants a break and this explanation sounded the most reasonable. But I hope he didn't get burned out because he was afraid of switching things up.
> I'm not sure I buy his reasoning there. Not everything is more than it seems. Its ten long years of uploading weekly. Thats hard graft.
Tom Scott: After ten years, it's time to stop making videos [video]
111–120 of 249 posts
Re: Tom Scott: After ten years, it's time to stop making videos [video]
#112Earlier quoted context omitted.
What's not to understand about UTF8? It's a way of coding up points in the Unicode space. You decode the bits and it yields a number that corresponds to a glyph, possibly with some decorations. The only thing special about UTF8 is that it happens to write ASCII as ASCII, which is nice as long as you realize that there is much outside that. Either that, or I'm completely off base and part of the vast horde who don't g…
Variable width encodings are inherently harder to understand. And while UTF-8 tries very hard to be simple whenever possible, it does have some nonobvious constraints that make it significantly more complex than the actual simplest variable-width encoding (a continuation bit and then 7 data bits).
Re: Tom Scott: After ten years, it's time to stop making videos [video]
#113Earlier quoted context omitted.
I'm not sure I buy his reasoning there. He said that he uploads a video every week which is a brisk pace. Why not a video every month? Every quarter? Perhaps he really just wants a break and this explanation sounded the most reasonable. But I hope he didn't get burned out because he was afraid of switching things up.
The algorithm on YouTube strongly favors a fast upload cadence, so that would lower the profit on his videos most likely
Re: Tom Scott: After ten years, it's time to stop making videos [video]
#114Earlier quoted context omitted.
I've lost a lot of my hearing so I play games, watch videos and people who put effort into subtitles are very much appreciated. Simple things like tagging who is talking is so helpful to understanding what is going on when there are multiple people in the video
In a number of his videos, they'll use different colours for different speakers. As best as I can see, while also choosing bright colours unlikely to cause problems for people with colour-blindness. It makes such a difference.
I wish more people out the time in, given how the state of AI is going I'm not sure when the auto generated subtitles don't differentiate between different people.
Re: Tom Scott: After ten years, it's time to stop making videos [video]
#115Earlier quoted context omitted.
I don’t see Steve Mould and Technology Connections, but thanks for your list :)
Through the magic of subscribing to both of them...
And I already have a subscription, right here!
Re: Tom Scott: After ten years, it's time to stop making videos [video]
#116Earlier quoted context omitted.
I agree! But the thing is— I’ve got about fifty Tom Scotts in my subscription list. I’m perplexed by doomsaysers’ laments about the state of online educational media. I’ve got far more high quality content for a huge variety of topics than I’ve ever had before. My theory is this: your favourite hobby store expands and adds one more aisle of fantastic products and five aisles of garbage. You’ll likely perceive quality…
the problem i have with educational youtube is that it's competence porn. it's quite satisfying to watch lyle peterson, kiwami japan, grandpa amu, nigel braun, grant sanderson, andy george, or xyla foxlin working through the problems involved in creating something, to the point that hours spent getting satisfied that way displace the far more effortful hours required to work through those problems myself. but i don't…
Well yeah. What if I spent all the time I spent on various types of consumption on deliberate practice. I'd be some kind of wizard by now.
There's nothing specially bad about these kinds of video in that respect.
Re: Tom Scott: After ten years, it's time to stop making videos [video]
#117I remember asking at some point what seemed to make Tom Scott so successful compared to the thousands of others who have probably tried to make it big on Youtube/social media. Was it the format/length/style, the topics, the camera work, the commentary/research, etc? I think the consensus was that he came out with generally interesting content, but most of all, predictably and sustained , which generated viewership. I…
There’s something grounded in a very particular kind of 1980s/90s BBC Television content in the values Tom Scott’s videos embody. It’s sort of like he managed to give himself a job roleplaying as a Blue Peter / Tomorrow’s World presenter. He basically carried forward the kind of Reithian ‘mission to inform’ BBC values that largely disappeared in the John Birt era and somehow brought them onto YouTube.
I have always found his patterns of speech interesting. Quite measured but untrained.
I've never met him but I know a few people who have and I'm told that he's exactly the same in person (at least at a formal dinner!) which probably tracks.
Re: Tom Scott: After ten years, it's time to stop making videos [video]
#118What struck me was “it’s either keep growing and become a manager or stop and do smaller projects” As someone who many years back looked at a team of 40 developers I was leading and went “nah, I want to be an IC again” that resonates
I'm not sure I buy his reasoning there. He said that he uploads a video every week which is a brisk pace. Why not a video every month? Every quarter? Perhaps he really just wants a break and this explanation sounded the most reasonable. But I hope he didn't get burned out because he was afraid of switching things up.
Yeah, this immediately came to mind for me as well. There's nothing set in stone that his production has to be weekly. He could move to monthly, or whatever. It doesn't even have to be a schedule, just whenever the next thing is ready push it. Which, he did leave the door open to but he also definitely seemed to couch this whole thing in "I'm completely done". It is a little weird, but of course he's free to do it how he wants
Although, he's not quitting completely and retiring, as he is still going to do all the other stuff (podcasts, other channels, etc) so maybe he's just shifting into different types of content, which is fine
Re: Tom Scott: After ten years, it's time to stop making videos [video]
#119Earlier quoted context omitted.
Variable width encodings are inherently harder to understand. And while UTF-8 tries very hard to be simple whenever possible, it does have some nonobvious constraints that make it significantly more complex than the actual simplest variable-width encoding (a continuation bit and then 7 data bits).
Even ignoring all the other advantages (mostly synchronization-related, which do objectively make implementing algorithms on UTF-8-encoded data simpler), "the number of set prefix bits is the number of bytes" doesn't seem meaningfully more complex than a single continuation bit.
Except when it's 1, because that's an invalid start, and except when it's 0, because that means the character is a single byte.
And it also means you're dealing with three classes of byte now.
Plus UTF-8 has more invalid encodings to deal with than a super-simple format.
Re: Tom Scott: After ten years, it's time to stop making videos [video]
#120I remember asking at some point what seemed to make Tom Scott so successful compared to the thousands of others who have probably tried to make it big on Youtube/social media. Was it the format/length/style, the topics, the camera work, the commentary/research, etc? I think the consensus was that he came out with generally interesting content, but most of all, predictably and sustained , which generated viewership. I…
Yeah this makes sense to me. He covered interesting and unique topics, and posted about them on a regular basis. That's extremely difficult to do in any medium, let alone something like video where filming and editing demands are significantly higher and a well researched piece just takes far longer to put together.