Super curious if there's any kind of contractual recourse where theaters can recoup the lost income from Sony. It's one thing if a projector breaks mechanically or due to a pre-existing bug; it's another thing when an update breaks it. In an age where updates are increasingly the norm, I wonder if there's legislation needed to hold manufacturers accountable for updates that break otherwise perfectly-functioning hardw…
> In an age where updates are increasingly the norm, I wonder if there's legislation needed to hold manufacturers accountable for updates that break otherwise perfectly-functioning hardware? Maybe there should be a law that says: 1. Upgrades may be performed but never behind the user's back. 2. In particular, the user determines exactly when an upgrade is performed. 3. The user may roll back any update at any time. 4…
Sony software updates breaks movie theater projectors
31–40 of 129 posts
Re: Sony software updates breaks movie theater projectors
#32Super curious if there's any kind of contractual recourse where theaters can recoup the lost income from Sony. It's one thing if a projector breaks mechanically or due to a pre-existing bug; it's another thing when an update breaks it. In an age where updates are increasingly the norm, I wonder if there's legislation needed to hold manufacturers accountable for updates that break otherwise perfectly-functioning hardw…
Arguably the hardware still functions perfectly, it’s the software that’s broken.
Re: Sony software updates breaks movie theater projectors
#33Super curious if there's any kind of contractual recourse where theaters can recoup the lost income from Sony. It's one thing if a projector breaks mechanically or due to a pre-existing bug; it's another thing when an update breaks it. In an age where updates are increasingly the norm, I wonder if there's legislation needed to hold manufacturers accountable for updates that break otherwise perfectly-functioning hardw…
>hold manufacturers accountable for updates that break otherwise perfectly-functioning hardware Wouldn't the license agreement that you agreed to when you installed the software specify any responsibilities of the vendor and define what recourse you might have? Why would government action be needed?
The government is not some foreign third actor, we live in a democratic society and as such, the way in which we do things is subjected to the desires of the public.
If enough people consider the government should intervene, then the government should intervene.
Re: Sony software updates breaks movie theater projectors
#34Re: Sony software updates breaks movie theater projectors
#35Super curious if there's any kind of contractual recourse where theaters can recoup the lost income from Sony. It's one thing if a projector breaks mechanically or due to a pre-existing bug; it's another thing when an update breaks it. In an age where updates are increasingly the norm, I wonder if there's legislation needed to hold manufacturers accountable for updates that break otherwise perfectly-functioning hardw…
> updates that break otherwise perfectly-functioning hardware? "Every update is a downgrade": http://itre.cis.upenn.edu/~myl/languagelog/archives/000606.h...
> Notice, I'm no Luddite. I don't reject technology. I depend on it.
Re: Sony software updates breaks movie theater projectors
#36Re: Sony software updates breaks movie theater projectors
#37Earlier quoted context omitted.
Not gonna happen in a million years
Some of those suggestions are things that sound good at first glance but are simply not great ideas. For example, support for downgrades means you a security vulnerability can be reintroduced by a malicious user which may not be desirable. Writing software that’s backwards and forwards compatible across all releases can be extremely expensive to impossible (eg a feature in your application that requires a new OS or y…
Actually, yes they are. I'm not a big fan of legislation, but the upgrade crazyness has to stop at some point!
> For example, support for downgrades means you a security vulnerability can be reintroduced by a malicious user which may not be desirable
What if "I, the user" deem it "desirable"?
I'm holding to bios with known vulnerabilities so I can work around "security features" that are "for my own protection" like 1) preventing me from underclocking (to keep the security features of the now-dead SGX) 2) using any M2 WWAN or NVMe that I want
It's gone to a point where it's not desirable for me to upgrade, and to prefer the risks that come with an exploit as at least I know my freedom to use my hardware the way I want will not suddenly become limited.
Another example: getting root on android with mediatek was considered a "bug" and work a mandatory "upgrade" that prevent users from being able to get root that way.
But I want to be root!
Re: Sony software updates breaks movie theater projectors
#38Super curious if there's any kind of contractual recourse where theaters can recoup the lost income from Sony. It's one thing if a projector breaks mechanically or due to a pre-existing bug; it's another thing when an update breaks it. In an age where updates are increasingly the norm, I wonder if there's legislation needed to hold manufacturers accountable for updates that break otherwise perfectly-functioning hardw…
> updates that break otherwise perfectly-functioning hardware? "Every update is a downgrade": http://itre.cis.upenn.edu/~myl/languagelog/archives/000606.h...
Even worse, something got updated that broke CEC integration with my sound bar on one of them, so now I can't use the built in volume control and need to use 2 remotes instead. I know it's a real first world problem, but it infuriates me that they can slowly ruin a TV that I own and I have no recourse.
I'm so sick of the tech industry I hope the whole thing collapses. We need major legislation updates to make tech companies liable for all awful they're doing to the world.
Re: Sony software updates breaks movie theater projectors
#39Earlier quoted context omitted.
I just don't see the need for a law which turns a civil issue into a criminal one. There are already existing frameworks for this - contracts. If someone isn't comfortable with the terms, then they don't use Sony products. If your argument is that Sony is too big and has a monopoly on projectors - then antitrust laws exist.
I think you are confused about how laws work. A law can cover sales and transactions without any criminal penalties. It can layout the ground for civil actions, to be taken by either government entities or the effected parties themselves. Just because a law is created doesn't mean a new crime with criminal penalties is created.
Re: Sony software updates breaks movie theater projectors
#40Super curious if there's any kind of contractual recourse where theaters can recoup the lost income from Sony. It's one thing if a projector breaks mechanically or due to a pre-existing bug; it's another thing when an update breaks it. In an age where updates are increasingly the norm, I wonder if there's legislation needed to hold manufacturers accountable for updates that break otherwise perfectly-functioning hardw…
> In an age where updates are increasingly the norm, I wonder if there's legislation needed to hold manufacturers accountable for updates that break otherwise perfectly-functioning hardware? Maybe there should be a law that says: 1. Upgrades may be performed but never behind the user's back. 2. In particular, the user determines exactly when an upgrade is performed. 3. The user may roll back any update at any time. 4…
3 - Maintaining a data path forward is tricky enough. Demanding that users be able to downgrade at anytime would be a very tall ask if user data has to survive the downgrade.
4 - This seems outlandishly expensive to do. This effectively reads “nobody can ever deprecate an api on anything”. This also seems to be broadly incompatible with fixing certain security vulnerabilities - would everybody have to maintain TLS 1.1 or plaintext api endpoints for old clients? Would a social media network have to maintain api endpoints that leaked more data than users were comfortable with?