Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

Thinking About Internet History

content.cooperate.com

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

11–20 of 24 posts

Re: Thinking About Internet History

#11

Post by Muromec »

Mizza wrote: post #3

I've been thinking a lot about this too. I was thinking people should start collecting written histories of their recollections of the internet, so future historians can understand the dynamics which shaped their future-present, like the "Great Digg Migration" and the "Tumblr Exodus", etc.

Up to what resolution does this need to be recorded in history? Out of all those events, what would be if significance once the century gate opens in 2100? I suspect that general vibe-shift and dynamics are important, but all the constituent dramas may be just that — small personal dramas.

Re: Thinking About Internet History

#12

Post by wtracy »

bongripper wrote: post #5

I much rather think about real history, there is more to learn from it for the future.

Online shopping has decimated brick-and-mortar retail over the last decade.

The Internet had a large influence on the 2016 election in the USA, particularly in getting Trump the Republican presidential nomination.

Misinformation about COVID spread across various forums potentially caused thousands of deaths across the USA and Europe in 2020.

Facebook had a key role in the 2022 genocide of the Rohingya people in Myanmar.

How much more real do you want?

Re: Thinking About Internet History

#13

Post by icehawk »

bongripper wrote: post #5

I much rather think about real history, there is more to learn from it for the future.

All the people on the internet are real and things on the internet that happen to them are real.

I've had so many friends scramble because twitter's decline means its harder to find things like job openings and commission work.

Re: Thinking About Internet History

#14

Post by throwoutway »

chaxor wrote: post #8
stl_fan wrote: post #2

I think Archive.org wayback machine and archive.today are going to be extremely valuable resources for "historical research" in the future. I hope they can continue their work via donor funding.

Are there any developments towards helping these efforts out by decentralizing / backing up parts of the archive and way back machine data? I know torrents are hugely important in helping to decentralize and maintain many important files in academia and such (e.g. NN weights and CERN data) but I think cephfs is also trying to allow decentralized data storage with redundancy. It seems like there is some solution which…

I worry that archive.org or wayback will not have sufficient funding and will need to close, and the sheer impact of that is greater than most realize. I hope there is a decentralized archive project

Re: Thinking About Internet History

#15

Post by Mizza »

DougEiffel wrote: post #4
Mizza wrote: post #3

I've been thinking a lot about this too. I was thinking people should start collecting written histories of their recollections of the internet, so future historians can understand the dynamics which shaped their future-present, like the "Great Digg Migration" and the "Tumblr Exodus", etc.

Even with written recollections and archives, it's going to be so difficult to follow. Things just change so quickly. The irony and memes that require you to understand 5 other memes are just going to be so difficult to capture in any meaningful way. I also think people might not care that much. They'll have an even more sophisticated and oversaturated version of the internet and I'm thinking they'll only really care…

> will probably be enough for most future people.

There is a future historian reading this comment and screaming at you.

Re: Thinking About Internet History

#16

Post by eropple »

Muromec wrote: post #11
Mizza wrote: post #3

I've been thinking a lot about this too. I was thinking people should start collecting written histories of their recollections of the internet, so future historians can understand the dynamics which shaped their future-present, like the "Great Digg Migration" and the "Tumblr Exodus", etc.

Up to what resolution does this need to be recorded in history? Out of all those events, what would be if significance once the century gate opens in 2100? I suspect that general vibe-shift and dynamics are important, but all the constituent dramas may be just that — small personal dramas.

> but all the constituent dramas may be just that — small personal dramas

We still wish we knew more about Nanni and Ea-nāṣir.

Re: Thinking About Internet History

#17

Post by ptek »

DougEiffel wrote: post #4
Mizza wrote: post #3

I've been thinking a lot about this too. I was thinking people should start collecting written histories of their recollections of the internet, so future historians can understand the dynamics which shaped their future-present, like the "Great Digg Migration" and the "Tumblr Exodus", etc.

Even with written recollections and archives, it's going to be so difficult to follow. Things just change so quickly. The irony and memes that require you to understand 5 other memes are just going to be so difficult to capture in any meaningful way. I also think people might not care that much. They'll have an even more sophisticated and oversaturated version of the internet and I'm thinking they'll only really care…

Ahh I remember the memes from 2013 which were the MS Paint drawn ones, "Forever alone", "Ma Gusta" ahh the rage comics.

Ever since I installed and started using EFF Privacy Badger I know a judge a website on the amount of trackers EFF Privacy Badger shows.

I get frustrated when I see my bank (Westpac) have trackers on their site :(.

This site is good as no trackers are showing up (for now).

Re: Thinking About Internet History

#18

Post by marttt »

DougEiffel wrote: post #4
Mizza wrote: post #3

I've been thinking a lot about this too. I was thinking people should start collecting written histories of their recollections of the internet, so future historians can understand the dynamics which shaped their future-present, like the "Great Digg Migration" and the "Tumblr Exodus", etc.

Even with written recollections and archives, it's going to be so difficult to follow. Things just change so quickly. The irony and memes that require you to understand 5 other memes are just going to be so difficult to capture in any meaningful way. I also think people might not care that much. They'll have an even more sophisticated and oversaturated version of the internet and I'm thinking they'll only really care…

Reminds me of this excerpt in Douglas Adams' "The Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy":

"Ford!"

Ford looked up from where he was sitting in a corner humming to himself. He always found the actual travelling-through-space part of space travel rather trying.

"Yeah?" he said.

"If you're a researcher on this book thing and you were on Earth, you must have been gathering material on it."

"Well, I was able to extend the original entry a bit, yes."

"Let me see what it says in this edition then, I've got to see it."

"Yeah OK." He passed it over again.

Arthur grabbed hold of it and tried to stop his hands shaking. He pressed the entry for the relevant page. The screen flashed and swirled and resolved into a page of print. Arthur stared at it.

"It doesn't have an entry!" he burst out.

Ford looked over his shoulder.

"Yes it does," he said, "down there, see at the bottom of the screen, just under Eccentrica Gallumbits, the triple-breasted whore of Eroticon 6."

Arthur followed Ford's finger, and saw where it was pointing. For a moment it still didn't register, then his mind nearly blew up.

"What? Harmless? Is that all it's got to say? Harmless! One word!"

Ford shrugged.

"Well, there are a hundred billion stars in the Galaxy, and only a limited amount of space in the book's microprocessors," he said, "and no one knew much about the Earth of course."

"Well for God's sake I hope you managed to rectify that a bit."

"Oh yes, well I managed to transmit a new entry off to the editor. He had to trim it a bit, but it's still an improvement."

"And what does it say now?" asked Arthur.

"Mostly harmless," admitted Ford with a slightly embarrassed cough.

(Quoted from https://web.eecs.utk.edu/~hqi/deeplearning/project/hhgttg.tx...)

Re: Thinking About Internet History

#19

Post by j45 »

ggm wrote: post #10

I have come to the conclusion this will best be left to professionals, and a significant amount of oral history has in fact already been collected and curated, by professionals. I wanted it to be me. The more I thought about it, the less equipped I felt. In some ways, it's the technologists curse, to believe your meta sense informs "the best way" when in fact, you're disrespecting another disciplines praxis assuming…

The world would be more boring with only professional stories and films.

Telling your experience of a story always has merit.

Adding something to the world isn’t solely for professionals. It’s not about being the first, or the last.

Re: Thinking About Internet History

#20

Post by ggm »

j45 wrote: post #19
ggm wrote: post #10

I have come to the conclusion this will best be left to professionals, and a significant amount of oral history has in fact already been collected and curated, by professionals. I wanted it to be me. The more I thought about it, the less equipped I felt. In some ways, it's the technologists curse, to believe your meta sense informs "the best way" when in fact, you're disrespecting another disciplines praxis assuming…

The world would be more boring with only professional stories and films. Telling your experience of a story always has merit. Adding something to the world isn’t solely for professionals. It’s not about being the first, or the last.

Tell your story to the pros. Archivists know how to filter. I've done some.
Post reply on HN