Live data from Hacker News

Disney, Warner, Comcast, and Paramount are contemplating cuts, possible mergers

arstechnica.com

291–300 of 330 posts

Re: Disney, Warner, Comcast, and Paramount are contemplating cuts, possible mergers

#291

It wasn’t all for naught, some hidden pearls came out of the low interest orgy thad made everyone and their dog open a streaming service. For instance, AMC+‘s „The North Water“ or Starzplay’s (yes, really) „Counterpart“. Any more recommendations?

Didn't they cancel Counterpart? I watched the first season but never watched the second one when I learnt that it was canceled.

Second season at least doesn't end on a cliffhanger. They take the time to end the story, especially JK Simmons' arc(s)

Re: Disney, Warner, Comcast, and Paramount are contemplating cuts, possible mergers

#292

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Disney could have done that and I would have paid. But they don’t make shows people want to watch any more. Live action Mulan could have been awesome! But they destroyed the themes of family honor and removed the music and comedy. Pander fatigue is real. I’ve got kids but I’m letting my Disney sub lapse. Anime is way better than the schlock Disney puts out.

The streamers make some shows that some people want to watch. Netflix’s report, first of its kind, showed 20 titles that you will have never heard of unless you use TikTok. Most people are watching the shows most other people are watching, it’s memetic. People want to feel like they’re a part of something; that is they’re are willing to pay $20/mo in Fear of Missing Out. Nobody has FOMO for old Disney content. The la…

Gabe Newell had it right, piracy is a service issue, not a price issue.

Re: Disney, Warner, Comcast, and Paramount are contemplating cuts, possible mergers

#293
post #274

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Not to backseat parent or anything, but I would never let my kids watch Anime unsupervised. Disney is fine, and they aren't going to sexualize minors like anime often does.

...I'm really having trouble understanding this comment. Maybe my sarcasm detector is broken? Watching anything unsupervised is of course age-dependent, so I'm not sure I understand the mechanism at work in that part of the comment. But on the deeper matter of Disney vs. anime: Obviously anime is a huge basket, so it depends on what studio and creator(s) we're talking about. There's plenty of amazing, reinforcing, va…

The truth is kids are resiliant and not stupid. generations "survived" these types of stereotypes and in 20 years someone else will be wringing their hands about the misguided stereotypes the current crop of acceptable movies is involved in (including everything you listed as a positive).

I would never hesitate to allow a child to watch any disney movie, but I definitely would hesitate to allow a child to watch Berserk or a lot of the borderline loli content. I remember watching Melancholy of Haruhi Suzumiya and waiting for the hammer to drop on the PE teacher who was constantly creeping on the teenage girls. When the season ended and it never happened I was completely confused, it wasn't until years later I found out that's an actual trope that shows up in a lot of anime.

What I'm saying is that I don't disagree with you that there are plenty of anime that's perfectly fine for children to watch, but the other posters concern is absolutely valid too, there's a lot of anime children shouldn't be watching (opening scene of elfin lied anyone?) and your hand wringing about Disney movies not being perfect doesn't move that needle in the slightest.

Re: Disney, Warner, Comcast, and Paramount are contemplating cuts, possible mergers

#294

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Everybody wanted to control the entire pie, when in reality almost all of them would have been better off just licensing their content to Netflix and not worrying about streaming distribution

So much this. Netflix was valuable to me because I could watch any movie at any time, but now the streaming space is so fragmented that no single provider is worth the price of the subscription, so our family doesn't pay for any of them. We told ourselves that if we really want to watch movies we'd just rent them off Amazon on a case-by-case basis, but in practice we just completely stopped consuming streaming conten…

I keep Netflix subscription most out of loyalty than anything else. I've had Amazon prime since it was first introduced but may drop it after the recent announcement.

I also tend to rent from Amazon if it's not on netflix, but if it's on neither or I disagree with the rent price or they don't allow you to rent, I just pirate.

I'm ok with them having my money, but once they started pulling everything off of netflix the entire landscape because anti-consumer. Their greed lost them my money.

Re: Disney, Warner, Comcast, and Paramount are contemplating cuts, possible mergers

#295
post #249

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I am in this boat as well. Our stream subscriptions are down to zero -- just the one I get for free with my cell carrier. And as for Disney and whatever the heck it is they have become, I have reverted back to purchasing purchased discs of any good movies or series.

Same, and with my toddler we’re back to good old fashioned DVDs. They may be slower, fragile and have a few unskippable parts but at least the ads are predictable, they don’t involve endless scrolling, and they belong to you.

I kind of skipped the whole blue-ray thing, but is there a reason for DVD over blue-ray besides the price?

Re: Disney, Warner, Comcast, and Paramount are contemplating cuts, possible mergers

#296
post #288

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What did they do that makes you think they valued creating social change more?

I could explain, but South Park did it so well already.

If anyone is genuinely curious, you're looking for "south park panderverse".

Re: Disney, Warner, Comcast, and Paramount are contemplating cuts, possible mergers

#297

I think this primarily comes down to a fundamental misunderstanding of where the value in streaming services lies from the perspective of old world media giants. The majority of people who buy streaming, I suspect, are interested mainly in the conveyor belt of diverse and engaging content. Sure I whack an episode of Rick and Morty on via Netflix once a month, but 90% of viewing is of new serialized content. Disney na…

I don’t think “beaming 4k video around the world” is really an issue at all.

The way the internet works, with peering etc. bandwidth is super, super cheap. It’s basically too cheap to meter. AWS bandwidth pricing has no relationship to actual bandwidth costs and never did.

Netflix has for years been operating open connect, basically they place proxy servers with ISPs (effectively a peering type arrangement). In 2021 Netflix said they spent $1B worldwide on open connect over the previous 10 years. But they spent $19B last year on “cost of revenue” which basically means content.

$20B a year on content. $0.1B a year on their CDN. I can’t imagine Disney, Comcast, etc is much different.

Re: Disney, Warner, Comcast, and Paramount are contemplating cuts, possible mergers

#298

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I want to be the consumer, not the product. With large media companies, it’s inevitable that I will become the product. Cable was supposed to be free of commercials. Streaming was supposed to be free of commercials. Thankfully books are still free of commercials.

Cable had ads on it from day one. Only a few premium channels didn't have ads or only had pre-roll ads.

this guy again.

stop it, when people say it's ad-free they mean the content wasn't disrupted with an ad.

stop attacking a strawman.

Re: Disney, Warner, Comcast, and Paramount are contemplating cuts, possible mergers

#299

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Then came the age of the streaming services, and for a time it was good again. It resembled the cable age of old, but with the power of choice! Maybe this was because VCs were footing the bill. Once companies have to be profitable the fun seems to end.

VCs footing the bill for such large disruptions of entire sectors only for them to end up the same seems like it should somehow be illegal. Uber killed off cab companies by being subsidized only to end up more (or just as) expensive except it screwed the workers in the process.

as far as I know cab companies are alive and kicking, they were just forced to give better service due to the increased competition.

And I can tell you I unequivocally prefer cab over uber, cab drivers are humans, uber drivers are fleshy extensions of an algorithm.

By this I mean I can ask a cab driver to wait and take me home, I cannot ask that of an uber driver.

Re: Disney, Warner, Comcast, and Paramount are contemplating cuts, possible mergers

#300

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It depends on the age of the kids—for the price of a Disney+ subscription you can buy ~2 DVDs a month, which at my kid's age (4 and 2) is way more frequently than they actually want to watch new movies. When I was a kid, (and I'm seeing it with my own kids) we had a tiny selection of movies that we loved to watch repeatedly. Why pay rent for that selection when you could own it for the same price?

Is that true for all kids? I thought popular opinion was that all new gen kids have insatiable content appetites with low attention spans demanding constant newness?

You create your own monsters. my 2 years old must have watched the mario movie 200 times at least. I was like him, I watched Aladdin 200 times.
Post reply on HN