Ask HN: How to square the circle of wanting to share ideas but not train AI?

Post by Engineering-MD » Mon, Dec 25, 2023, 10:01 PM UTC

computronist wrote: post #10

Engineering-MD wrote: post #9

Earlier quoted context omitted.

And what benefit does having an idea in a training set have to me? The effect an idea has does not necessarily work to my benefit, perhaps the opposite. Your statements are perhaps true for faith matters and I commend your… religious zeal. I would suggest opposing examples of non freely shared information: designs of jet engines, advanced microchips, and GPT4 architecture to name a few. Those who hide and do not free…

Meh. Your loss. The panoptic computronium cathedral is an inevitable technological development and if you don't want to be part of the training set then you will be relegated to the dustbin of history.

Post by adastra22 » Tue, Dec 26, 2023, 9:58 AM UTC

Engineering-MD wrote: post #4

adastra22 wrote: post #3

Give up. You wanted to share ideas. Presumably so that others could learn from you and share remixed ideas of their own. But if a machine is involved in doing the exact same thing you object? Grow up. You don’t get to control how your freely given ideas are used.

And perhaps why that is why ideas are not freely shared, which seems to be the new direction. Although even for freely given ideas plagiarism is not seen as acceptable, and current AI is a great plagiarism laundering method. A machine is not the same as a human. Limitations are useful, and feeding an infinite algorithm is very different to discourse. Despite your rude and dismissive manner, it’s been useful to think…

Post by haltist » Tue, Dec 26, 2023, 6:49 PM UTC

Engineering-MD wrote: post #14

haltist wrote: post #12

Earlier quoted context omitted.

No luck necessary. It is inevitable.

Ok Thanos