Live data from Hacker News

Translation and accelerated solving of differential equations on GPU platforms

arxiv.org

31–34 of 34 posts

Re: Translation and accelerated solving of differential equations on GPU platforms

#31
post #29
post #27

OT: I was hoping for a html version in light of: https://blog.arxiv.org/2023/12/21/accessibility-update-arxiv... I guess this wasn't uploaded in LaTeX? Ed: Oh, this may be a date of submission thing: > as long as papers were submitted on or after December 1st, 2023 and HTML conversion is successful

Replace the x with a 5 in the abstract URL.

https://ar5iv.org/abs/2304.06835

Thank you! I guess that's what:

> If you are familiar with ar5iv, an arXivLabs collaboration, our HTML offering is essentially bringing this impactful project fully “in-house”. Our ultimate goal is to backfill arXiv’s entire corpus so that every paper will have an HTML version, but for now this feature is reserved for new papers.

Refer to.

Re: Translation and accelerated solving of differential equations on GPU platforms

#32
post #14

Submitters: " Please use the original title, unless it is misleading or linkbait; don't editorialize. " If you want to say what you think is important about an article, that's fine, but do it by adding a comment to the thread. Then your view will be on a level playing field with everyone else's: https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=false&so... (Submitted title was "Julia GPU-based ODE solver 20-100 x f…

That rule seems problematic. You cite the rule, and then the last line of your comment explains that you've violated the rule.

As another example, I recently read a Factorio blog about how they do map generation, and there were a lot of technical details any aspiring game developer would be interested in, even if they don't play Factorio. The title of the blog post was "Maps 2.0" which would be meaningless as a HN title. Something like "How Factorio's procedural map generation works" would make more sense for HN, but would require breaking the rule. What should be done in this case?

Re: Translation and accelerated solving of differential equations on GPU platforms

#34
post #14

Submitters: " Please use the original title, unless it is misleading or linkbait; don't editorialize. " If you want to say what you think is important about an article, that's fine, but do it by adding a comment to the thread. Then your view will be on a level playing field with everyone else's: https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=false&so... (Submitted title was "Julia GPU-based ODE solver 20-100 x f…

That rule seems problematic. You cite the rule, and then the last line of your comment explains that you've violated the rule. As another example, I recently read a Factorio blog about how they do map generation, and there were a lot of technical details any aspiring game developer would be interested in, even if they don't play Factorio. The title of the blog post was "Maps 2.0" which would be meaningless as a HN ti…

It's problematic if you expect the rules to work like code; they don't. It's less problematic once you understand than HN has always been a spirit-of-the-law place, not a letter-of-the-law place (https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=false&qu...).

From that perspective it's easy to see how the submitted title was breaking the rule, and how shortening a title so as to fit HN's 80 char limit is not breaking the rule, as long as one doesn't shorten it in a misleading or linkbait way.

(Re your Factorio blog question, I'd have to see the particular article to answer that.)

Post reply on HN