211–220 of 321 posts
But maybe it's just the font. Is there a way to change which font is used?
however, something like f(x)= sin(x)/x, f(0) returns NaN.
Are there any plans to support derivatives, integration and summation?
This reminds me a lot of org-mode( https://orgmode.org/ ). Do you have plans to add other org-like features, like evaluating code blocks? I don't personally see myself moving away from org-mode, but it would be nice to have something to recommend to people who are reluctant to use emacs, even if it's only for a single application.
Oh, I haven't seen orgmode before, so I don't know what its features are. I'm not planning to add evaluation of code blocks (apart from Math blocks that is) due to the complexity it would add.
Essentially, it’s an environment for writing+outlining+task tracking+time management. It’s incredibly useful — you should definitely try it since you’ve used Emacs.
I love this! Simple and solid execution. I've been wanting to build something similar for some time now, might fork and play around with it. Thank you for open sourcing it! I've started using Obsidian with a new note for each day and separating "blocks" with a Markdown horizontal rule (`---`) to achieve something similar, but this is much cleaner. The strength of such an approach is making capture extremely easy -- n…
It's not open source, as it uses the Commons Clause which severely limits what can be done with it (the name is misleading).
This is amazing! One thing I'd love to see though is the ability to zoom in/out like in Sublime
One request (which I would happily pay for): make it so that you can run the code blocks and generate an output. I routinely crack open the browser console to test out some JS and it would be great to be able to do this right alongside my other notes.
This is just outstanding. It's so exactly what I wish for out of a scratch pad. My feature request to add to your pile (possibly a lonely one, since maybe it's just unique to how my brain works): I really want a scratch pad like this to have UX that supports "inverted" order. Meaning, new blocks get added to the top of the page instead of the bottom. The blocks naturally flow in descending order of creation rather th…
I also like this. But I don't like the distraction of seeing all the blocks below my cursor move every time I make a new line. The perfect UX would be to add a new buffer at the top, but with enough padding to fill the window so that you can't see the movement of previous blocks while you're typing. (Maybe this is already kinda how it works - I haven't downloaded the app yet, but I'm excited to try it, because it loo…
Uhm... They don't move. They stay the same distance, relative to your line. As you add more lines, they'll disappear below the fold.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
I also like this. But I don't like the distraction of seeing all the blocks below my cursor move every time I make a new line. The perfect UX would be to add a new buffer at the top, but with enough padding to fill the window so that you can't see the movement of previous blocks while you're typing. (Maybe this is already kinda how it works - I haven't downloaded the app yet, but I'm excited to try it, because it loo…
>I don't like the distraction of seeing all the blocks below my cursor move every time I make a new line. Uhm... They don't move. They stay the same distance, relative to your line. As you add more lines, they'll disappear below the fold.