Live data from Hacker News

$750 a month, no questions asked, improved the lives of homeless people

latimes.com

41–50 of 206 posts

Re: $750 a month, no questions asked, improved the lives of homeless people

#41

"About 2% of the total went to alcohol, cigarettes and drug expenses — the largest portion of which was cigarettes" I'm pretty sure that the average American spends more than 2% of their income on drugs.

That spending was self-reported.

Do you think the average American would self-report more?

Re: $750 a month, no questions asked, improved the lives of homeless people

#42
post #22

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Read the article, or read the recent UCSF study on homelessness[0]. The data suggest that mental illness and drug addiction are both symptoms of, or exacerbated by, homelessness, not causes of it. Please don’t argue with me about this here without citing the available data. 0. https://homelessness.ucsf.edu/our-impact/our-studies/califor...

[flagged]

Pull up on the drama a bit. It’s not insulting, you’re going very far out of your way to be insulted. And also, I deal with the homeless population every day too and disagree with you. Stop pretending like everyone who disagrees with you doesn’t have experience with the homeless population. If anything, that’s what is insulting.

Re: $750 a month, no questions asked, improved the lives of homeless people

#43
post #3

The headline as written should surprise no-one. Anyone receiving free money would probably have their life improved along some dimension, even if it just means they're not doing as many dangerous things to get money to buy more drugs. The implicit assumption seems to be that giving homeless people money to improve their lives is inherently a moral good. Unlike many homeless advocates, I don't think it is a given that…

Cash is sometimes the most efficient way to distribute aid to ill people.

Unless - do you believe we shouldn’t aid ill people at all?

Re: $750 a month, no questions asked, improved the lives of homeless people

#44

Did it reduce their agency like it did all the covid unemployed?

According to the article: "Those who got the stipend were less likely to be unsheltered after six months and able to meet more of their basic needs than a control group that got no money, and half as likely as the control group to have an episode of being unsheltered." So, it seems like it helped get most people back on their feet and into a place where they can live independently without financial support.

did it actually get them back on their feet? i.e. to the point where they no longer needed the free money? or did it improve their lives by being able to purchase/consume $750 more of goods and services?

Almost anyones life would be improved by a free $750/month, wether or not it makes any lasting change versus simply making them dependent on another government program is the real question.

Re: $750 a month, no questions asked, improved the lives of homeless people

#45
post #6

The question is more if your fellow humans appreciates you enough to help you. On the other side even the egoistic view would give homeless people money just to have them of streets.

During covid in Australia, we just put the homeless in hotels. It didn't cost much in comparison to the other government spending around that time and homelessness was largely eliminated. Then we got over the pandemic and tossed people out onto the street. Homelessness for some is a choice by society. Especially in the west.

Re: $750 a month, no questions asked, improved the lives of homeless people

#46
post #31

As someone who is nearing 2,000 days of two stints of homelessness since 2017, I can offer feedback that such an amount would help to alleviate basic survival pressures. But, money will not solve any root cause issues. I've been unhoused and out of work for so long that any recovery back to a normal life has become exceedingly unlikely. I don't drink alcohol, I don't smoke, nor do I do illicit drugs nor prescriptions…

[flagged]

Re: $750 a month, no questions asked, improved the lives of homeless people

#47
post #36
post #24

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Weird, I do. I live within a minute's walk of three separate encampments of homeless people, most of whom seem reasonably sane when I talk to them, and if they have drug problems they certainly aren't more apparent than those of my coworkers on average

Is there a feature that lets you disable replies to your comment? I find it hilarious that the person arguing that their egregiously dehumanizing stereotypes of the homeless are simply objective reality rather than biased and that I must be lying has done so if so

> Is there a feature that lets you disable replies to your comment?

No, but Hacker News will not show the reply button to a comment made extremely recently, to discourage quick back-and-forths.

Looking at the timestamps I suspect that's what you're seeing.

Re: $750 a month, no questions asked, improved the lives of homeless people

#49

"About 2% of the total went to alcohol, cigarettes and drug expenses — the largest portion of which was cigarettes" I'm pretty sure that the average American spends more than 2% of their income on drugs.

I think its insightful that there are thresholds

if you have $50 and it wont make a difference in getting what you actually need, then fast food and fast thrills are what it will be spent on

if you have $750 or some other threshold, you can try to make a difference to get out of it

its like “give a man a fish” versus “sign up for fishing classes, get books, equipment and train so you’ll never have to be in the situation ever again”

Re: $750 a month, no questions asked, improved the lives of homeless people

#50
post #17
post #7

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I think a lot of productive hardworking people's money has been spent on propaganda whose sole intention is to ensure that people equate homeless people to "mentally ill drug addicts" rather than, say, "private equity real estate buyup refugees"

How many homeless people do you interact with daily? Because I'm forced to interact with many of them on a daily basis to simply go about my life in the Bay Area. And almost all of them, with very very few exceptions are both mentally ill and drug addicts. I used to think like you, but being forced to deal with them in real life on a daily basis has a way of killing preconceived convenient notions.

They're not homeless because they were mentally ill drug addicts. They're mentally ill drug addicts because they're homeless.

People without a stable living condition experience severe stress and mental illness as a result. People without necessities to live turn to drugs to alleviate the pain and suffering they experience.

This study is one example of how giving money to people to alleviate their conditions can improve their lives and enable them to further engage in self improvement.

Post reply on HN