Live data from Hacker News

Apple partly halts Beeper's iMessage app again, suggesting a long fight ahead

arstechnica.com

561–570 of 665 posts

Re: Apple partly halts Beeper's iMessage app again, suggesting a long fight ahead

#561
post #466

Earlier quoted context omitted.

the alternative is just continuing to sms people from your android because at least you know the messages are definitely going through, green bubble or not

SMS is not reliable. Messages are routinely lost.

iMessages too. "failed to send" is a real thing, with no notification.

Re: Apple partly halts Beeper's iMessage app again, suggesting a long fight ahead

#562
post #518

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I can understand not trusting FB, but you have to give out the ID you want people to be able to find you by. What you give to Signal is probably less than what's in the phone directory. > I wish others services just did the same. Signal did, then someone convinced them that the risk of accidentally sending an SMS which you thought were an encrypted message, was bad enough to break messaging integration on Android. I…

Signal is strongly focused on secure communication, so it never made any sense for it to support SMS/MMS. I think bundling different protocols in the same app is a bad idea in general. Besides the security and functionality problems, it just creates confusion. The whole iMessage/bubble-color mess wouldn't exist if Apple made it clear to their users that the iMessage protocol is different from SMS and incompatible wit…

Well imessage does the exact same thing. It doesn't seem to confuse the users. More basic protocols as a fallback mechanism can be a good idea, if you understand the risks (and of course, if you allow the recipient to use the better protocol!)

Signal always warned me very clearly if it was forced to send a message via SMS, and even pushed me to invite the recipient to Signal. It made sense to support it still, because it's the second most basic service in the Android world (after calls), and now that Signal doesn't offer it, it can't be the default service any longer.

Signal's task as I see it isn't just to protect your communication, but encourage widespread use of strong encryption so that you don't stand out for using it. For that, there are tradeoffs. I think being able to handle the forced insecure communication for the user, clearly marked as such, was a great tradeoff for the sake of wider adoption.

Re: Apple partly halts Beeper's iMessage app again, suggesting a long fight ahead

#563
post #424

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Youre being downvoted but I also lose a message every few months between my girlfriend and I. We both have relatively new iPhones and exclusively use iMessage so I do think its some rare protocol bug.

I'm surprised so many people claim they haven't experienced it and I wonder how many have and just don't know.

Ya I think most just would not notice between friends. But we’ve compared our iMessages and we aren’t doing anything weird like sharing apple IDs. Not a huge deal so it’s whatever, but if any Apple engineers read this: plz fix

Re: Apple partly halts Beeper's iMessage app again, suggesting a long fight ahead

#564

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> what stops me from buying a second hand mac or a second hand iphone (for $150 each) and start 'doing business' with iMessage? Nothing, that's why iMessage is full of spam already. What scammers do is buying boxes of old half broken iphones and they turn them into relays exactly as you said.

I have never received a single spam message through iMessage, but regardless. If they have to keep buying new phones all the time as they get blacklisted, in order to keep spamming, the economics of spamming changes.

I did recieve some spam messages there, so Apple's claims about muh security etc. already is bogus

Re: Apple partly halts Beeper's iMessage app again, suggesting a long fight ahead

#565
post #548

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I think saying its US only is oversimplifying, its at least also true in some european markets.

Which ones? I have friends (young and old) all over Europe and everyone uses WhatsApp. Everywhere I've been in Europe defaults to WhatsApp, even for business communication. Like, it's n=1, but still, my experience is quite broad.

In Denmark hardly anyone uses WhatsApp by default. No business I’ve seen uses it. Android is common.

I’m currently in Indonesia however, and it’s universal both privately and corporately.

Re: Apple partly halts Beeper's iMessage app again, suggesting a long fight ahead

#566

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This assumes that all Beeper Mini users are spam, and that's a weird take. More charitably, perhaps you are saying spam will increase over previous levels. From what I understand, Apple does not have any spam prevention technologies in Messages at all, neither for incoming iMessages, nor for SMS messages-- so the only thing keeping your iMessage conversations free of them is the obscurity of the protocol. Perhaps the…

The same technology Beeper Mini uses to get onto iCloud can also be used by spammers, crooks, etc. to get onto iCloud. You either get both or none. Frankly, as a paying Apple customer, I want them to close this because I hate SPAM. Also, the obsession of iMessage seems very strange to me.

Nonsense. You still just receive SMS messages as normal, so any spam will be delivered to you regardless.

The solution to spam is to petition your government to crack down, or do server side filtering. Banning random phones is like playing whack a mole.

Re: Apple partly halts Beeper's iMessage app again, suggesting a long fight ahead

#567
post #325

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This has been discussed ad nauseam. In the US, not being a "blue bubble" can have a very high social cost and get you excluded from groups and communication opportunities. People just want to be able to communicate without ridiculous walled garden vendors throwing stupid road blocks in their way and making things artificially harder to get you to "buy your mom an iphone."

That’s a ridiculous reason to demand an open protocol from Apple. I get that it sucks when you’re in high school and kids are massive jerks about social standing, but this can’t be a serious use case post college, right? Anecdotes about mean girls on Tinder dumping Android users don’t really seem compelling, either.

It is surprisingly a serious use case post college. In my personal life, if someone is going to be so stupid and immature as to not want to communicate with me because I'm an Android user, then good riddance. I don't need people like that in my life.

However, there are a lot of people who are impacted, and it's not always the case of the mean girl on tinder dumping an Android user. I know people who have group chats with family and friends, that will be left out because the iPhone is programmed to downgrade the entire group's chat if a single member is an Android user. This makes it so that messages don't work all the way, quality on images and video is garbage, and other legitimate usability concerns. Are super snooty, it's that it truly is very difficult to communicate from an iPhone to an Android phone.

Re: Apple partly halts Beeper's iMessage app again, suggesting a long fight ahead

#568
post #276

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This has been discussed ad nauseam. In the US, not being a "blue bubble" can have a very high social cost and get you excluded from groups and communication opportunities. People just want to be able to communicate without ridiculous walled garden vendors throwing stupid road blocks in their way and making things artificially harder to get you to "buy your mom an iphone."

The fact that some people are snobs doesn’t justify the government dictating software specifications to Apple.

It's not just snobbery. There are real and serious usability issues. When doing group communication between an iPhone and a group member who is in Android user. The entire group chat gets downgraded to SMS, which means a lot of messages don't get through the way they were intended, and images and videos are so downgraded as to be unusable. The people that I know personally who are affected by this, it has nothing to do with snobbery and everything to do with pragmatism. People on iPhone will only use iMessage in the United States. It's stupid, it's absurd, it's self-inflicted, but ultimately it is what it is and all the advocacy of moving to something else is not moving the needle.

Re: Apple partly halts Beeper's iMessage app again, suggesting a long fight ahead

#569

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If Americans are this dumb, I don't see why they need any laws to protect them. Why would I want to be part of any groups that won't have me because I don't use an iPhone? Thankfully, here outside America, this isn't an issue: absolutely no one uses SMS or cares about this stuff.

> If Americans are this dumb, I don't see why they need any laws to protect them. They aren't. The bubble color thing is an exaggerated claim and a lot of whining from a bunch of clowns. No one actually cares in the US except for a bunch of children (who are always prone to following trends for the sake of following the trend) and a handful of immature adults. The rest of the country doesn't know or care

That's a very ignorant thing to say. Try to force yourself to live with images and video of quality to SMS so you can actually understand the problem, and let's see how long you think it's just immaturity.

We can disagree about solutions, but strawmanning stuff is dumb, and then dismissing the problem that you strawmanned is even more dumb

Re: Apple partly halts Beeper's iMessage app again, suggesting a long fight ahead

#570

Earlier quoted context omitted.

My father has an iPhone 8 which did not receive the latest iOS update. I can iMessage him just fine. There are millions of people out there running old iPhones like that. If Apple just decided to cut them all off iMessage they would do far more damage to their brand than Beeper could possibly manage.

My mom has an iPhone 5s running iOS 12 (current is iOS 17, so the software itself is already five years old), and iMessage still works well.

I started using a 5s as a temporary replacement phone for a while a couple of years ago, and I couldn't register to iMessage, but I didn't dig really far (it was a generic "registration failed" iirc). It might have been a fluke and not old phones can't register anymore.
Post reply on HN