Earlier quoted context omitted.
> that people (mostly in the English speaking world) aren't capable of rational discourse about socialism or redistribution or inequality because these are all Communism-adjacent topics I agree, but for the opposite reason. As soon as I replied to you, you stopped talking about the topic itself and started communicating how tired you were, and how laborious talking about all this is. That's why you can't have a ratio…
Well, you did claim that > You've decided the person does like socialism and communism, but is afraid to say so Maybe this assertion of yours didn't help? Are you willing to consider this? edit: but since the OP also misunderstood my observation, I'm willing to concede the point I wasn't clear enough.
I'll consider anything if it's mentioned. If you just said "Ah - I see what happened here. What I actually meant was ..." about 3 comments ago, we'd have had a regular conversation. I honestly don't understand this approach - even here you don't just say what you mean. You ask whether an assertion didn't help as though you aren't sure yourself.
I have much more success just talking plainly. Makes it much more fun and productive to talk about this stuff.