Live data from Hacker News

Tesla Recalls 2M Vehicles over Autopilot Software Issue

nytimes.com

1–10 of 149 posts

Re: Tesla Recalls 2M Vehicles over Autopilot Software Issue

#4
post #3
post #2

Note: “tesla recalls” == “tesla pushes OTA software update (just like any regular OTA update)”

gotta love the NYT for accurate headlines

It's not incorrect, it's just confusing:

https://cleantechnica.com/2022/07/24/is-recall-really-the-ri...

Re: Tesla Recalls 2M Vehicles over Autopilot Software Issue

#6
post #3

Earlier quoted context omitted.

gotta love the NYT for accurate headlines

It's not incorrect, it's just confusing: https://cleantechnica.com/2022/07/24/is-recall-really-the-ri...

The NYT is more than capable of making a clear headline. These are not stupid people. But they do have goals.

Re: Tesla Recalls 2M Vehicles over Autopilot Software Issue

#8
post #2

Note: “tesla recalls” == “tesla pushes OTA software update (just like any regular OTA update)”

From the article:

> Tesla began issuing an “over-the-air software remedy” to certain vehicles on Tuesday, safety officials said. The remaining vehicles will receive software updates later, and all updates will be free for the cars’ owners.

I was confused as to why Tesla needs to "recall" when they can do OTA update. The title is misleading

surprise

Re: Tesla Recalls 2M Vehicles over Autopilot Software Issue

#9
post #2

Note: “tesla recalls” == “tesla pushes OTA software update (just like any regular OTA update)”

Yeah I was wondering about that too. I got a software update that seemed to add auto steer to my non-self-driving model y. I tried it a few times on the highway but it seemed erratic (switching off randomly and dangerously engaging regenerative brakes in the fast lane). Won’t be trying again until next update (if it sticks in the car).

edit: corrected autopilot (cruise control) -> self driving

Re: Tesla Recalls 2M Vehicles over Autopilot Software Issue

#10
post #2

Note: “tesla recalls” == “tesla pushes OTA software update (just like any regular OTA update)”

I think at some point the absurdity of the numbers (now it's 2M, soon it'll be 10M, 50M, ...) will become so great that NHTSA will stop calling this a "recall", and then this term will no longer be usable for clickbait article titles. Absurdity because it'll get harder and harder to imagine how a company might bring in millions and millions of vehicles in for service repeatedly, from a logistics and cost perspective, and still be able to grow and make a good profit.
Post reply on HN