Live data from Hacker News

Wordstar-keys: Implement wordstar cursor control keys in Linux using xkb

github.com

1–10 of 27 posts

Re: Wordstar-keys: Implement wordstar cursor control keys in Linux using xkb

#4
> Arrow keys are the bane of keyboard life. You constantly have to lift your hands off the touch-typing home keys to move around your software file

Or you can purchase a programmable keyboard with customizable chords such as an Ergodox keyboard.

Re: Wordstar-keys: Implement wordstar cursor control keys in Linux using xkb

#5
i like how macos does it with separating the ctrl key from most actions with command key. so we can use ctrl in gnu readline style freely on all text areas natively.

for example to find in document, you press cmd-f and you can use ctrl-f to move cursor forward in text (or ctrl-option-f to jump to the next word etc.)

Re: Wordstar-keys: Implement wordstar cursor control keys in Linux using xkb

#6

> Arrow keys are the bane of keyboard life. You constantly have to lift your hands off the touch-typing home keys to move around your software file Or you can purchase a programmable keyboard with customizable chords such as an Ergodox keyboard.

with kmonad you don't even need a programable keyboard.

Re: Wordstar-keys: Implement wordstar cursor control keys in Linux using xkb

#8
post #2

Interesting. I think I might be I interested if I weren’t a vi-mapping kinda guy. The ubiquity is good.

I use vi frequently, but I would be interested if the Wordstar mappings provide a speed benefit. They do seem to be easier to type.

Re: Wordstar-keys: Implement wordstar cursor control keys in Linux using xkb

#10

I only know Wordstar as being the text editor GRR Martin uses to write on his DOS machine: https://www.theverge.com/2014/5/14/5716232/george-r-r-martin...

Wordstar was the dominant word processor because it was designed from the ground up to be as portable as possible, which made it available on a wide variety of 80s home computers, particularly those running CP/M.

Eventually that portability came to hurt it, because eventually everyone was running DOS, and Wordstar couldn't take advantage of DOS's unique environment, and so WordPerfect came along and ate its lunch.

Post reply on HN