Earlier quoted context omitted.
What grounds would Apple have for suing?
"No reverse engineering" is a pretty standard TOS item.
I think Beeper is intentionally aiming for (heavily publicized) litigation to set a precedent.
271–280 of 1001 posts
Earlier quoted context omitted.
What grounds would Apple have for suing?
"No reverse engineering" is a pretty standard TOS item.
I think Beeper is intentionally aiming for (heavily publicized) litigation to set a precedent.
Google could be leading that charge and providing a world beating chat app that works across all phones and all desktop devices. They have every reason to provide the best chat app in the world and yank iPhone users over to it. Instead they have given up on chat. The Google Hangouts/Meet chat situation is a disaster on iPhone and on desktop. They don't even try. It's proof that they are lost.
I have a feeling they're not going to stop being a thorn in Apple's side for quite a while...
Earlier quoted context omitted.
> iPhone customers desperately want to be able to chat together is also laughably false lol. iPhone users just want android users to get an iphone.
...in the US. The rest of the world uses Telegram, WhatsApp and Signal. This blue/green bubble SMS but not SMS -thing is a 100% an American issue.
The only people that care are:
- Maybe some children
- Some immature adults
- A lot of people who have never used an iPhone and don't even know what the blue/green bubble is but whine about it anyways.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
I think they ignored a rarely talked about but important aspect. iMessage is free for Apple users because it comes bundled with all Apple products. The cost to run iMessage and deliver millions of messages daily must be a significant number. With beeper, they are enabling the functionality for android. That is every android user signed up with beeper will end up costing Apple some money to send messages to iphone (or…
I'm sure most android users would be happy if iMessage-on-Android was included as part of the $0.99/month icloud subscription.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
The best case outcome is to get publicity leading to US and EU antitrust regulators to file a lawsuit against Apple, both of which Apple loses. The conclusion of this lawsuit is that not only must Apple allow access to iMessage, they also must allow changing the default for every component of iOS - messaging app, browser, app store, let you replace Siri with other voice assistants - and to lower the 30% app store fee…
Ironically, if Google were ever allowed to replace siri on iPhones, I would probably never buy an android again.
https://www.howtogeek.com/713498/how-to-launch-google-assist...
I remember doing something like this a while ago.
Why are Apple users so upset about this? It's almost as if they don't want interoperability with Android users. And please spare me the spam excuse.
1. Forcing a monopoly when they force-migrated their users to iMessage
2. Maintaining said monopoly by keeping third parties out
Best thing they could do is put third party clients into a MFI like program and loads of red tape.