Earlier quoted context omitted.
Dark frame subtraction cannot remove cosmic rays. It removes things the camera sees in the dark at the time of dark frame capture. This is things like dead pixels, hot pixels and amp glow. If a cosmic ray was removed by a dark frame, two cosmic rays would have had to happen, one during dark frame and one during the actual capture. They'd have had to be the same intensity and hit the same pixels. This is probably neve…
What's the freezer thing about?
Nikon makes firmware for astronauts to block cosmic rays in photos
31–40 of 70 posts
Re: Nikon makes firmware for astronauts to block cosmic rays in photos
#32Earlier quoted context omitted.
So, wait. The camera can fix dead pixels but only does so once a month? Dead pixels are dead easy to detect by the sensor, why don’t they do it immediately? Way to ruin a bunch of photos between cleanups…
Every photo taken shortens the life of a sensor.
Also, a dead pixel is not a ruined photo, it’s a minor inconvenience in editing at worst. And every photo I take on a FF is getting edited, the gorgeous RAW output is what I’m there for.
Re: Nikon makes firmware for astronauts to block cosmic rays in photos
#33It’s a poorly written and badly explained article. The first comment does a great job of explaining why, and how the new “firmware” actually works
Re: Nikon makes firmware for astronauts to block cosmic rays in photos
#34Earlier quoted context omitted.
If you use a Sony A7 series camera, every month, the camera will take a picture upon shutting it off, which it uses to remove dead pixels/hot pixels - you can hear it, actually. If ever you have a pixel die or get stuck, you can also manually set the date a couple months ahead and turn it off - it will most likely be fixed when it turns back on.
So, wait. The camera can fix dead pixels but only does so once a month? Dead pixels are dead easy to detect by the sensor, why don’t they do it immediately? Way to ruin a bunch of photos between cleanups…
It sucks, but it is what it is, and it's not too difficult to batch remove dead pixels - if you even notice them.
Re: Nikon makes firmware for astronauts to block cosmic rays in photos
#35Earlier quoted context omitted.
If you use a Sony A7 series camera, every month, the camera will take a picture upon shutting it off, which it uses to remove dead pixels/hot pixels - you can hear it, actually. If ever you have a pixel die or get stuck, you can also manually set the date a couple months ahead and turn it off - it will most likely be fixed when it turns back on.
Does it affect RAW photos or only JPEGs?
Re: Nikon makes firmware for astronauts to block cosmic rays in photos
#36Earlier quoted context omitted.
So, wait. The camera can fix dead pixels but only does so once a month? Dead pixels are dead easy to detect by the sensor, why don’t they do it immediately? Way to ruin a bunch of photos between cleanups…
Every photo taken shortens the life of a sensor.
Re: Nikon makes firmware for astronauts to block cosmic rays in photos
#37I wish there was good software for hot pixel removal in normal digital cameras. Sure you can photoshop pictures one by one, but if you have the same set of bad pixels on every shot and need to remove them in batches? Nothing will do that as far as I know.
Re: Nikon makes firmware for astronauts to block cosmic rays in photos
#38Re: Nikon makes firmware for astronauts to block cosmic rays in photos
#39Earlier quoted context omitted.
That's not really true, it's only a problem for the shutter. The sensor doesn't really break.
You’re right. I misremembered. The term is “shutter life”. Same result though.
Re: Nikon makes firmware for astronauts to block cosmic rays in photos
#40Earlier quoted context omitted.
So, wait. The camera can fix dead pixels but only does so once a month? Dead pixels are dead easy to detect by the sensor, why don’t they do it immediately? Way to ruin a bunch of photos between cleanups…
Every photo taken shortens the life of a sensor.