Live data from Hacker News

A genetically modified bacterium that outcompetes bacteria causing tooth decay

astralcodexten.com

121–130 of 158 posts

Re: A genetically modified bacterium that outcompetes bacteria causing tooth decay

#121
post #108
post #104

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Teeth are an abomination and your body works hard to reject them, purifying your mouth and your soul so you can die appropriately shriven of your sin. Big Dentistry is trying to keep you from heaven!

Reject luxury bones.

back to invertebrates, turning into worms

Re: A genetically modified bacterium that outcompetes bacteria causing tooth decay

#122
post #29

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The idea that primates get cavities less frequently than modern humans is a bit outdated and not terribly supported by recent studies. The main difference is in the location of the cavities, not frequency – apes tend to get cavities in their front teeth, humans tend to get cavities in the molars.

Oh interesting. I didn't realize. Are there theories on what causes that difference? Is it diet?

I read up on this a bit. It seems that it is diet. Captive primates eat a more grain rich diet while the wild ones get most of their sugar from fruit

Re: A genetically modified bacterium that outcompetes bacteria causing tooth decay

#123

Earlier quoted context omitted.

From the article, the claim is that this strain of S mutans variant produces mutacin-1140 which allows it to outcompete other strains of S mutans and other Gram-positive bacteria. I have no particular opinion about whether this claim is plausible or true, but you don't address this at all in your comment even though it's directly relevant. For example, if this strain's production of mutacin-1140 allows it to kill oth…

> if this strain's production of mutacin-1140 allows it to kill other bacteria ... Wonder if it could in a different direction, giving rise to other oral bacteria also unaffected by mutacin-1140?

The mutation that allows it to produce this (and to survive it) is a naturally occurring one. This strain, with that mutation, was found in the wild, which was what gave rise to the idea to use it in this way in the first place. One of the modifications they _did_ do was to break this bacteria's lateral gene transfer machinery so that it can't spread these genes to other strains.

However it is likely that, since this one strain managed to evolve this trait, that others have as well.

Re: A genetically modified bacterium that outcompetes bacteria causing tooth decay

#124
post #36

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The article gives this as the explanation of how it is supposed to work: BCS3-LI has four main genetic modifications: It produces a weak antibiotic, mutacin-1140, which kills competing oral bacteria. It’s immune to mutacin-1140, so it doesn’t kill itself. It metabolizes sugar through a different chemical pathway that ends in alcohol instead of lactic acid. It lacks a peptide that its species usually uses to arrange g…

> It metabolizes sugar through a different chemical pathway that ends in alcohol instead of lactic acid. It'd be quite funny to live in a future where cavities don't exist, but breathalysers are useless. (without rinsing your mouth out first, I guess) Hopefully it doesn't dry out gums and cause gum disease.

The article extensively talks about the amount produced. While it has not been tested against breathalyzers, it is producing so little alcohol that it seems unlikely to be a problem. The claim in the article is that, across 24 hours, you might consume a few miligrams of alcohol, as compared to "if you swallowed 1/10th of your mouthwash, that would be ~200 milligrams of alcohol". So across the entire day, you are producing a couple orders of magnitude less alcohol than is in 1/10th of a mouthwash treatment (or 1/5th I guess if you use it twice a day).

Re: A genetically modified bacterium that outcompetes bacteria causing tooth decay

#125

Anecdote time: My great grandmother lived to be 102 and never had a cavity. Kept all her teeth to the end. One time, an orderly who thought she was just being senile tried to reach into her mouth to take out her teeth (thinking she had dentures). My great grandmother bit that person; hope they learned not all old people are senile! I’m 40% of the way there. No cavities and rave reviews from my dentist. I brush—-best…

How's your breath? Frequently you either have a mouth microbiome that ends up acidic and prone to cavities, or you end up with a high pH mouth which lends itself to tartar buildup and halitosis. Of course if your teeth are decaying due to cavities and this is left untreated, halitosis is also a common result.

I don’t get negative reviews to my knowledge :)

Maybe it’s the balance of regular coffee intake for lowering pH but a naturally higher pH?

Re: A genetically modified bacterium that outcompetes bacteria causing tooth decay

#126

This story has been around for far too long and evidence is unbelievably weak, and the claims border on fraudulent. 1. The claim that this strain outcompetes the same S mutans from occupying the same niche cannot be true unless this strain is also capable of creating and tolerating environments with low pH. By definition if it creates acid to the same degree it will also cause cavities. 2. Single applications are ins…

The article includes evidence that shows persistent colonization for a year after a single application. And it appears to be a steady prevalence for the last 6 months of that.

Now, to be fair, what I would have _liked_ to see is actually percent prevalense of the various cavity causing bacteria for that year, since that's the thing we really care about (in case this bacteria _isn't_ succesfully killing those strains).

But it certainly appears that they have succesfully engineered a strain that can persist in your mouth after a single application (although they admittedly claim that this application needs to follow a special cleaning procedure to remove most of the existing bacteria)

Your comment seems to really not address any of the specific information provided in the article and seems to be a generic response to the idea.

I love hearing from experts who disagree with an article, it's important to hear those views. But this would have been a much more valuable comment if it could have responded more specifically to the claims and information in the article rather than the general idea.

Re: A genetically modified bacterium that outcompetes bacteria causing tooth decay

#127
post #100

It's insane to voluntarily colonize your body with a virtually untested genetically engineered bacteria. The article claims it occurs naturally but they have no good data on its natural prevalence and they added two additional mutations to the natural strain they found. Even if it's safe, is it effective? The only way to tell is to enroll the people who are colonized in a long-running study. Are they doing that?

As the article points out: genetically engineered probiotics are already a thing. Everyone's risk tolerance is different, but this doesn't seem that big a deal to me personally. If it was already available for a more reasonable price, I'd probably get it tomorrow.

Re: A genetically modified bacterium that outcompetes bacteria causing tooth decay

#129
post #80

So, in order to bypass the FDA, you plan to produce a bacterium, export it, go somewhere outside the US, pass it to people and then everybody returns to the US? what happens if someone, ahem, takes a dim view of the process and denies entry on biosecurity grounds?

> U.S. citizens cannot be denied entry to the U.S. for any reason

https://www.aclunc.org/our-work/know-your-rights/know-your-r...

Re: A genetically modified bacterium that outcompetes bacteria causing tooth decay

#130

Anecdote time: My great grandmother lived to be 102 and never had a cavity. Kept all her teeth to the end. One time, an orderly who thought she was just being senile tried to reach into her mouth to take out her teeth (thinking she had dentures). My great grandmother bit that person; hope they learned not all old people are senile! I’m 40% of the way there. No cavities and rave reviews from my dentist. I brush—-best…

How's your breath? Frequently you either have a mouth microbiome that ends up acidic and prone to cavities, or you end up with a high pH mouth which lends itself to tartar buildup and halitosis. Of course if your teeth are decaying due to cavities and this is left untreated, halitosis is also a common result.

Not OP but this is how it is for me.

Also, anecdotally, from people I've spoken to, it seems they get either caries or tartar. It's a decent sample size, more than a dozen.

Yet the last time I went to a dentist, 2010 or so, she claimed to have never heard of this, and I couldn't find any good studies either. Do you know of any?

Post reply on HN