> Amazon's humanoid robot That was me working for AWS.
Amazon's humanoid robots will eventually cost only $3 per hour to operate
21–30 of 79 posts
Re: Amazon's humanoid robots will eventually cost only $3 per hour to operate
#22I expect workers like this. Warehouse picking is grueling work and no one really likes it per se. So having a robot do it is good to allow humans to do other things. I don’t think the solution is to keep grueling jobs or pay more to make people do things they don’t want to do. Of course more money is good, but at the end of the day, it’s a repetitive job that doesn’t require much thought. What’s interesting is that i…
Re: Amazon's humanoid robots will eventually cost only $3 per hour to operate
#23I expect workers like this. Warehouse picking is grueling work and no one really likes it per se. So having a robot do it is good to allow humans to do other things. I don’t think the solution is to keep grueling jobs or pay more to make people do things they don’t want to do. Of course more money is good, but at the end of the day, it’s a repetitive job that doesn’t require much thought. What’s interesting is that i…
> That’s cheap enough that middle class people will have live in super servants.
Take into consideration that, if AI and robot super servants exist, the idea of a middle class will almost certainly have to be redefined downward. Your job will be less valuable, as you get get undercut both by automation, and by the highly motivated people who lost their jobs due to automation and who would do yours for less money. That would change the economic accessibility of live-in super servants.
Re: Amazon's humanoid robots will eventually cost only $3 per hour to operate
#24I wonder how the "Tesla Bot" would compete if ever finished. In theory Tesla has an advantage in both Ai and especially manufacturing.
Amazon is almost certainly far ahead of Tesla in robotics AI. They have been at the forefront of that field for >10 years.
Re: Amazon's humanoid robots will eventually cost only $3 per hour to operate
#25Its like saying amazon's robot dogs after a boston dynamics demo
Re: Amazon's humanoid robots will eventually cost only $3 per hour to operate
#26I expect workers like this. Warehouse picking is grueling work and no one really likes it per se. So having a robot do it is good to allow humans to do other things. I don’t think the solution is to keep grueling jobs or pay more to make people do things they don’t want to do. Of course more money is good, but at the end of the day, it’s a repetitive job that doesn’t require much thought. What’s interesting is that i…
Where I live, entire towns have sprung up around Amazon warehouses and the huge influx of workers this brought with it. If picking jobs are eliminated, this will be quite the change for those areas.
next I guess comes the corporate towns and company scrips.
Re: Amazon's humanoid robots will eventually cost only $3 per hour to operate
#27I wonder how the "Tesla Bot" would compete if ever finished. In theory Tesla has an advantage in both Ai and especially manufacturing.
Re: Amazon's humanoid robots will eventually cost only $3 per hour to operate
#28Re: Amazon's humanoid robots will eventually cost only $3 per hour to operate
#29I expect workers like this. Warehouse picking is grueling work and no one really likes it per se. So having a robot do it is good to allow humans to do other things. I don’t think the solution is to keep grueling jobs or pay more to make people do things they don’t want to do. Of course more money is good, but at the end of the day, it’s a repetitive job that doesn’t require much thought. What’s interesting is that i…
Where I live, entire towns have sprung up around Amazon warehouses and the huge influx of workers this brought with it. If picking jobs are eliminated, this will be quite the change for those areas.
Re: Amazon's humanoid robots will eventually cost only $3 per hour to operate
#30I expect workers like this. Warehouse picking is grueling work and no one really likes it per se. So having a robot do it is good to allow humans to do other things. I don’t think the solution is to keep grueling jobs or pay more to make people do things they don’t want to do. Of course more money is good, but at the end of the day, it’s a repetitive job that doesn’t require much thought. What’s interesting is that i…
Not to mention those are wildly different use cases. Picking items in a warehouse is a less complex task than handwashing a single sink full of assorted dishes, let alone being a general servant.