An existential problem in the search for alien life
theatlantic.com
An existential problem in the search for alien life
1–10 of 81 posts
Re: An existential problem in the search for alien life
#2Re: An existential problem in the search for alien life
#3Despite the environment being -320 or +320 Celsius.
I don’t know what to make if it. It’s weird.
Re: An existential problem in the search for alien life
#4Almost all space news stories look for the “thrilling possibility of life” angle. Despite the environment being -320 or +320 Celsius. I don’t know what to make if it. It’s weird.
You do have a point - 47 degrees below absolute zero is probably too cold for life
Re: An existential problem in the search for alien life
#5Almost all space news stories look for the “thrilling possibility of life” angle. Despite the environment being -320 or +320 Celsius. I don’t know what to make if it. It’s weird.
> Despite the environment being -320 or +320 Celsius You do have a point - 47 degrees below absolute zero is probably too cold for life
Re: An existential problem in the search for alien life
#6Re: An existential problem in the search for alien life
#7Re: An existential problem in the search for alien life
#8What could it be? Near-zero term in the Drake equation? The dark forest? A great filter?
To understand different possibilities, they decided to determine the cause using a computer simulation. However, due to hardware limitations, they were only able to simulate one civilization at a time.
We can only speculate what the final answer was.
Re: An existential problem in the search for alien life
#9Almost all space news stories look for the “thrilling possibility of life” angle. Despite the environment being -320 or +320 Celsius. I don’t know what to make if it. It’s weird.
Re: An existential problem in the search for alien life
#10Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Despite the environment being -320 or +320 Celsius You do have a point - 47 degrees below absolute zero is probably too cold for life
Integer underflow flips it to trillions.
It’s clearly floating-point.