Live data from Hacker News

Rest in Peace, Optane

specbranch.com

121–122 of 122 posts

Re: Rest in Peace, Optane

#121

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Rebooting is often the first thing we do to fix stuff. Depends on the environment. That used to be the common approach for windows, less so for *nix systems.

Linux is pretty good now about not having the whole system lock up, but restarting programs still seems to be the #1 troubleshooting action.

Yeah. There's a large difference with restarting an individual application and the whole system though. Sometimes several minutes difference. ;)

Re: Rest in Peace, Optane

#122

Optane suffered the same fate as every other storage technology over the decades with a similar value proposition. Broadly, the notional value of storage technology like Optane is that it offers a drop-in improvement in storage performance without requiring any software modification, albeit at a significant cost premium. The theory that this market exists in any significant way never pans out in practice. On one hand…

>Broadly, the notional value of storage technology like Optane is that it offers a drop-in improvement in storage performance without requiring any software modification, albeit at a significant cost premium. I don't think so at all. The value of Optane was that it was dramatically different, offering byte-addressable storage with latency of hundreds of nanoseconds. Getting the most out of this requires radically red…

It says here latency for Optane read is about 10 µs.[1].

It says here an SLC drive has the same latency for sequential read (random read is 5x higher though). [2]

[1]https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/products/docs/memory...

[2]https://www.solidigm.com/products/data-center/d7/p5810.html

Post reply on HN