Live data from Hacker News

System-wide open source ad blocker for Mac, Windows, and Linux

github.com

141–150 of 173 posts

Re: System-wide open source ad blocker for Mac, Windows, and Linux

#141

Hello HN! Having just posted the app to a couple of small subreddits before sleep and then waking up to being on the front page over here is quite an experience :) I was hoping to make a Show HN post after giving Zen a bit more polish, but I guess here we are. Thanks for all the constructive feedback. I totally share your concerns about its security and likewise wouldn't use some unverified application trying to inst…

Thank you for your work! If you are interested in users verifying your binaries, maybe sigstore could help you. https://www.sigstore.dev/

Are any well known projects using sigstore? It looks interesting.

Re: System-wide open source ad blocker for Mac, Windows, and Linux

#142

I'm comfortable with a DNS based blocker (pi-hole) and it seems to work quite well. Bonus: It works across all devices on the network, rather than installing something onto the OS.

"Bonus: It works across all devices on the network, rather than installing somthing onto the OS." A proxy can be installed "onto the OS" of a RPi. It does not have to be installed on the computer used to view web pages. A Pi-Hole is a modified dnsmasq installed "onto the OS" of a RPi.

They were clearly referring to the OS of a device someone would browse on, not the OS of a network device.

Re: System-wide open source ad blocker for Mac, Windows, and Linux

#143

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I seem to end up regretting anything I do at the network level to block traffic. It always seems to pop up that one weird time I actually do need something from a blocked domain to load, and it takes me way too long to remember that's what I did to block it.

I find it also a bit frustrating because browsers may even ignore your network's DNS settings so you can easily get unexpected behavior (yes, I know it's expected if you are a domain expert but I'm not and it shouldn't be surprising when users are shocked that they implement a pihole and see their machine is using a different DNS than expected. I'd actually expect novice users to be surprised in this case)

> browsers may even ignore your network's DNS settings

They should't. Bypassing policy is malware behaviour.

Funny that they ignore "my" network DNS, not ISP's. (in the name of freedom)

Re: System-wide open source ad blocker for Mac, Windows, and Linux

#144
post #107

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I seem to end up regretting anything I do at the network level to block traffic. It always seems to pop up that one weird time I actually do need something from a blocked domain to load, and it takes me way too long to remember that's what I did to block it.

I have a very simple setup that works for us. ISP’s router has unrestricted Wi-Fi access. I run a router behind it with restricted (via pi-hole) access. All devices connect to the restricted Wi-Fi. Any time I need unrestricted access, I connect to the ISP router Wi-Fi for some time and back to the restricted when done.

Don't you mean you run the restricted router in front of the ISP router?

Re: System-wide open source ad blocker for Mac, Windows, and Linux

#145

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What do you mean trying to? Look at this shit. https://imgur.com/a/d0jq4s1 Every time you stamp it out they find a way to sneak it back in.

If that was my macOS start menu, I’d smash my display with anything I had at hand

It's pretty damn atrocious. I run a different startmenu and taskbar, but it still bugs me.

I still prefer Windows with ads modified to hide those ads over MacOS though.

Re: System-wide open source ad blocker for Mac, Windows, and Linux

#146
post #55

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Probably not. Use a dedicated tool like a custom browser (Mullvad Browser comes to mind - it beats fingerprint.com/demo which Firefox even WITH protections enabled, does not.

You may also want to see https://librewolf.net/ while not as good by default compared to Mullvad Browser, it may still be a browser to consider.

I'e been using Librewolf for almost a year now, and like it a lot. Also have some other extensions and tweaks in a user.js

How much better is Mullvad Browser and why?

Re: System-wide open source ad blocker for Mac, Windows, and Linux

#147
post #9

It is just not wise to allow some random application to MiTM your SSL traffic.

If you can read the code and asure that the traffic won’t be sent to a malicious third party, why not? What is the concern?

The concern is that it's a huge waste of time for everyone to read the code, and a significant investment of time for anyone to do so, that's why not

Re: System-wide open source ad blocker for Mac, Windows, and Linux

#149
post #83

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Google pays loads of people to conceive and write code that is malicious to endusers e.g. those not paying it for eyeballs.

Is Google going to hack your bank account?

They're going to do everything they can to learn how much money you have in your account and then they'll relentlessly try to manipulate you into losing more of your money.

Re: System-wide open source ad blocker for Mac, Windows, and Linux

#150
post #77

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's in no way worse than running a single browser extension with overly broad privileges. If this method of adblocking gains more traction (quite possible, as Google keeps moving to damage in-browser ad blockers), I expect the implementation to receive a lot more scrutiny. I think we have to face the reality that web browsers might no longer be considered "user" agents.

> I think we have to face the reality that web browsers might no longer be considered "user" agents. I think too many techies are, much like yourself, contributing to the problem by refusing to move away from Chrome for "reasons"[1], and then compounding it by refusing to acknowledge that "web browsers" != "Google Chrome". [1] The "reasons" are of dubious quality. Myself and many others are able to do all normal web-…

> I think too many techies are, much like yourself, contributing to the problem by refusing to move away from Chrome [...]

Contrary to your assumptions, I've been quite vocal against the Chrome/Blink monoculture for a while. Unfortunately there is a legit case for it; several generations of "low-end" devices (anything older than 10 years basically), that are still quite capable and in common use, where the difference in performance between Firefox and Chromium becomes quite noticeable, especially as you try to watch video.

I don't think the problem is "techies", we have zero influence outside our own circles - see the historical rates of Linux adoption. The problem is we need the good ol' hammer of antitrust to start swinging again. We also need the regulators to be smart; if we get really unlucky, they will target iOS Safari instead. (This would be good in a healthy ecosystem, but would only serve to further entrench Google's position in the current situation.)

By the way, using a filtering/rewriting proxy has other merits, especially on said older hardware; you can rewrite the entire web page to make it more lightweight and accessible. Check out miniwebproxy[1] and medium-rare[2]. It's also quite simple to write one; you need maybe a hundred lines of Go to start getting results. I've been experimenting with integrating Readability[3][4]; and I think there's more potential to this approach.

[1]: https://humungus.tedunangst.com/r/miniwebproxy

[2]: https://humungus.tedunangst.com/r/medium-rare

[3]: https://github.com/go-shiori/go-readability

[4]: https://github.com/mozilla/readability

Post reply on HN