Leaving F-Droid

#1

Post by JetSpiegel » Mon, Dec 04, 2023, 10:13 AM UTC

Re: Leaving F-Droid

#2

Post by c0balt » Mon, Dec 04, 2023, 1:14 PM UTC

Fyi, linked in the post is the statement in the fdroid GitLab org, https://gitlab.com/fdroid/admin/-/issues/447. This provides a bit more context. It also contains a reply from Hans regarding this statement.

Re: Leaving F-Droid

#3

Post by jdorfman » Mon, Dec 04, 2023, 1:19 PM UTC

What is ComCo?

Re: Leaving F-Droid

#4

Post by concordDance » Mon, Dec 04, 2023, 1:19 PM UTC

I'm quite unclear on what thos drama is about and what the consequences of it are.

Re: Leaving F-Droid

#5

Post by mikelovenotwar » Mon, Dec 04, 2023, 1:22 PM UTC

jdorfman wrote: post #3

What is ComCo?

Community Council https://gitlab.com/fdroid/admin/-/issues/447

Re: Leaving F-Droid

#6

Post by cantrememberit » Mon, Dec 04, 2023, 1:25 PM UTC

Nothing quite shows how deserving one is of filling a responsible role than dragging personal conflicts into the public and - without providing proper context - blaming other people for it.

My congratulations to Hans; as it turns out, he has done the F-Droid project yet another excellent service.

Re: Leaving F-Droid

#7

Post by [deleted] » Mon, Dec 04, 2023, 1:28 PM UTC

jdorfman wrote: post #3

What is ComCo?

[deleted]

Re: Leaving F-Droid

#8

Post by rodlette » Mon, Dec 04, 2023, 1:30 PM UTC

concordDance wrote: post #4

I'm quite unclear on what thos drama is about and what the consequences of it are.

+1. This style of public post that say "I'm leaving because of problems which I am not disclosing" are odd.

Re: Leaving F-Droid

#9

Post by remram » Mon, Dec 04, 2023, 1:33 PM UTC

This is quite serious. The only point of f-droid is to be a community repository, if it is controlled by a single individual doing harmful things with no oversight, it is over as far as I'm concerned.

Re: Leaving F-Droid

#10

Post by robertlagrant » Mon, Dec 04, 2023, 1:33 PM UTC

> me for trying to hold Hans accountable for blocking protecting marginalised community members from abuse

I think understanding this statement is key. Blocking what protections? From what abuse? How and when were they blocked? Without that context, it's hard to say this text has any more clarity than the text accuses Hans' responses of having.