Earlier quoted context omitted.
I disagree with the posted page that the telecoms are interested in stopping spam. If they really cared, they would have addressed it by now. I suspect they are somehow making money from the spam callers.
> telecoms are interested in stopping spam. If they really cared, they would have addressed it by now I'm not so sure about this. No one (except for, obviously, spammers) benefits from email spam, every mailhost and network admin is most certainly interested in stopping it (to some extent), and yet my mailbox can prove that spam is still very much alive. Solving spam problems in a highly distributed large federation…
I agree and disagree with this statement:
1. The distributed system can't solve the spam problem, because it's not a technical problem.
2. The population can immediately solve the spam problem by responding in the affirmative to every single request they get.
What makes spam profitable is the quality of the responses - right now only the marks respond, so every response is valuable to the spammer as it is a lead that will almost certainly result in money.
If the spammer sends out 3m SMS/robocall messages, and gets 5 responses, those responses are worth actual money!
OTOH, if the spammer sent out 3m SMS/robocall messages, and got 3m responses (of which only 5 are worth money), then the spam would quickly stop.
IOW, by self-selecting into one of two groups (will give you money/won't give you money) we are making spam profitable.
This is the only way to stop spam of any kind - poison the database.