Earlier quoted context omitted.
That's not really what people are sharing in this thread, to be honest.
I've read the thread and don't know what you mean.
Lobsters
121–130 of 212 posts
Re: Lobsters
#122If you want Lobsters style tags and filtering on Hacker News stories: https://histre.com/hn/ (d: mine)
Don't see any clues here as to how the tags are chosen and matched to stories. Can you provide further?
Re: Lobsters
#123I had an account here. I still do. Like some other people point out: Invitation-only means trolls are less likely to show up. But the higher end of quality is not significantly better than HN. If anything, it might be worse. My experience with the moderation there is that some people post clear self-promotion articles, but when I attempted to post my things, I get told that this content is not welcome on the site. Wh…
Re: Lobsters
#124Re: Lobsters
#125Re: Lobsters
#126Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's literally the top comment and its children.
I've certainly read that thread, and I don't know what you're trying to say.
Re: Lobsters
#127I like the discussions there but looking for an account so I can post. Currently going through github issues and finding things I can fix so someone rewards me.
Re: Lobsters
#128Any reason why HN source code is not published? The best I can think of is not to let people see the penalizing behavior, but having an open standard might actually help it improve rather than keeping it as a hidden secret that slowly gets discovered by independent malicious parties.
Re: Lobsters
#129Would be less of a ghost town if they allowed sign ups rather than via invitation only. Appreciate that's kinda the point of the site, but if it's a ghost town then it's clearly petered out.
It's not a ghost town, it's just not as noisy as HN. It's quite active.
Re: Lobsters
#130Earlier quoted context omitted.
I have never thought of it that way, and I'm still not sure I understand the idea. For some people the point of visiting a site is related to the number of votes or comments?
Well no the numbers aren't going to be a thing anyone directly cares about. Of course not, haha. Looking at my previous comments I'm not sure I even said anything that would imply that? What the numbers represent (how active the community is) is the bit folks would care about. In any case I used the numbers as a measure of how much the site is growing or not growing in response to the comment I responded to. The numb…
I agree people want some activity on discussion forums, otherwise what's the point. Another hand I think a lot of people think volume is inversely related to Quality once you get past a certain threshold