Live data from Hacker News

Microsoft is planning an 'Advanced Windows Settings' panel for power users

xda-developers.com

51–60 of 78 posts

Re: Microsoft is planning an 'Advanced Windows Settings' panel for power users

#51

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Have you considered Linux?

It's arguably worse there. You got regular settings + GNOME Tweaks + a bunch of settings that can only be changed via CLI or some .ini file.

That's a fair assessment. I'm in the process of moving to Linux because I find windows 11 to be so incredibly awful. I'm using Ubuntu and it's been mostly a good transition, but learning a new operating system does have a learning curve for me.

Re: Microsoft is planning an 'Advanced Windows Settings' panel for power users

#54

This is interesting as a blog article from 2003 "Why doesn't Windows have an 'expert mode'?"[0] was posted here a couple weeks ago. [1] The reasoning was that users self-rating at being advanced because they are good in one domain might lead them to messing with things they have no idea on. I suppose the flaw is that people find ways to mess with stuff regardless, even if just following the first google result's inst…

Reminds me of the late 90s when I was trying windows NT4 and the message "please contact your administrator" that kept popping when something failed.

I was alone on my personal computer and kept wondering "who is my administrator?"

Took me a while to figure out that it was me.

Re: Microsoft is planning an 'Advanced Windows Settings' panel for power users

#55

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Have you considered Linux?

It's arguably worse there. You got regular settings + GNOME Tweaks + a bunch of settings that can only be changed via CLI or some .ini file.

Also: which desktop? At least you can install multiple desktops and switch at login.

FWIW, I like Cinnamon best, but I also like KDE and XFCE (plus, XFCE works especially well over remote desktops and inside virtual machines). I've never cared for later versions of GNOME and ran away screaming.

Re: Microsoft is planning an 'Advanced Windows Settings' panel for power users

#56

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I would love concept of "adult computing", where I can mark a checkbox "I herby guarantee that I'm not going to blame $company for me being a moron and installing malware/destabilizing device due to changing random options". Then device starts behaving like piece of hardware I own, shows error messages that actually tell something and in general doesn't assume if I drop dead if presented with more than two buttons on…

Do you also agree to pay me compensation if your computer is part of a bot ring that is ddos’ing me or spamming me or spamming my users, because you installed malware? Can you put up a bond for this or proof that you carry insurance for this?

You're free to sue me like for any other harm. Also, do you think that now you are protected against that? Will Google/Apple pay you compensation if due to to their negligence locked down devices become part of botnet?

Edit: but honestly if I could pass "driver test" for computer, pay insurance in the range of my car insurance and it would mean that I will never meet error message without details and I would not ever be locked out from configuring my device, however I please, I would take that deal.

Re: Microsoft is planning an 'Advanced Windows Settings' panel for power users

#57
post #47

I miss Windows XP / 7, everything went downhill after.

Comments like these make me wonder if you are looking back with rose colored glasses. You didn't mention Vista, which is universally regarded as a failure and in the same timeframe as you described. While some of Microsoft's more regrettable decisions have yet to be made by 7, but there are still plenty of bad ones to choose from. Games for Windows Live, Fisher Price UI, massive software vulnerability, Office "ribbon…

You're missing the point: to the extent there were things you didn't like about XP and 7, you could fix them. Your relationship with your OS vendor was that of a paying user, not a hostage.

Re: Microsoft is planning an 'Advanced Windows Settings' panel for power users

#58
post #48
post #27

Remove telemetry and ads?

No settings needed — there's always the "I wasn't asking" approach of deleting the DLLs that contain the code for these misfeatures.

Could you please expand about this? Last time I checked it required to spend a lot of time to remove that options and/or run a "magic script" that I don't clearly know what it does (security wisely).

Re: Microsoft is planning an 'Advanced Windows Settings' panel for power users

#59
post #11

Where's the power user setting to turn off all the enshittification?

It’s called “install Linux”

Every single Linux DE sucks and will suck an incredible amount of your time if anything goes wrong / you want to tweak something niche. Open source (in the Linux DE world) = free = eff it, I’m not getting paid, they should be thankful

Re: Microsoft is planning an 'Advanced Windows Settings' panel for power users

#60
post #35

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Hey, don't stop them now - I'm having a great time watching Windows independently recreate every complaint about Linux GUIs:D If you thought QT/GTK was bad, wait 'til you see multiple styles and not-quite-overlapping settings panels from a single company!

E-Mail (32-Bit) ... Just leaving this here

The classic Control Panel allows everyone to add an icon to it. Most of those additions are quite pointless, like the Mail icon, which belongs to Microsoft Outlook and opens a configuration window you can easily access from within Outlook itself. The modern settings UIs are not extensible like this, nor should they be.
Post reply on HN