If the article is based on facts then... is this not an example of corruption?
OpenAI Committed to Buying $51M of AI Chips from a Startup Backed by Sam Altman
31–40 of 248 posts
Re: OpenAI Committed to Buying $51M of AI Chips from a Startup Backed by Sam Altman
#32If the article is based on facts then... is this not an example of corruption?
Worldcoin Whoever thinks that was a good idea doesn’t seem to have any concept - nor care for - morality and ethics, in my view. Maybe the board firing him was exactly over this and look who prevailed.
[0] I don't, he clearly does
[1] I am not sure, I want to but suspect it will cause inflation unless done very carefully, but UBI needs biometrics to avoid Sybil attacks
Re: OpenAI Committed to Buying $51M of AI Chips from a Startup Backed by Sam Altman
#33If the article is based on facts then... is this not an example of corruption?
Re: OpenAI Committed to Buying $51M of AI Chips from a Startup Backed by Sam Altman
#34Re: OpenAI Committed to Buying $51M of AI Chips from a Startup Backed by Sam Altman
#35Re: OpenAI Committed to Buying $51M of AI Chips from a Startup Backed by Sam Altman
#36Google has their own chips. Amazon do... Meta as well... Vertical integration is a competitive advantage worth pursuing for OpenAI. The spin is just that - spin.
That would leave Meta's other shareholders paying the bill while missing out on the gains if the project becomes a success. In other words, the risk is shared but the potential rewards are reaped by just one shareholder.
Re: OpenAI Committed to Buying $51M of AI Chips from a Startup Backed by Sam Altman
#37If the article is based on facts then... is this not an example of corruption?
I am not a lawyer, but not necessarily. I think it comes down to, is this good for this company. If not and you are directing sales to another company that benefits you, that would be bad, but if buying from the other company you invest in is good for OpenAI, then it's ok. You are allow to have other investments, it comes down to disclosure, and not making a bad deal for reasons that personally profit you.
I was helping to implement ISO through small orgs (most likely overkill...) and remember one of important bits was that each purchase had to go through a process of selecting supplier. I wonder if this is also the case in OpenAI (I'd guess it is?). But I also can imagine, if there is only one supplier who provides given goods then the process is not very helpful.
Re: OpenAI Committed to Buying $51M of AI Chips from a Startup Backed by Sam Altman
#38Google has their own chips. Amazon do... Meta as well... Vertical integration is a competitive advantage worth pursuing for OpenAI. The spin is just that - spin.
Re: OpenAI Committed to Buying $51M of AI Chips from a Startup Backed by Sam Altman
#39Come on. A guy mentions Sam's sister in his post and it's immediately flagged and hidden xD this site sometimes, seriously, the techbro team picking and worshipping is something else haha
I mean, one can just say, I don't know and don't care about this and that is their personal problem to deal with while I receive millions of dollars in shares.
The whole point is stay away and don't play the "MeToo" game.
Re: OpenAI Committed to Buying $51M of AI Chips from a Startup Backed by Sam Altman
#40If the article is based on facts then... is this not an example of corruption?
It's called a conflict of interest. A smart or well advised CEO would seek approval from the board before such a deal. And maybe it was, when this specific CEO went looking for the approval or communicated it to the board, that soap opera got triggered.